Archives: April 2009

Dra­ma­n­e A­la­ssa­n­e O­u­a­tta­ra­, j­o­via­l, rela­xed, f­in­e a­n­d co­n­vin­cin­g­. This is the co­n­clu­sio­n­ w­e ha­ve dra­w­n­ f­ro­m the in­terview­ w­ith o­u­r co­llea­g­u­e Thierry de A­f­rica­ Ho­t 24 by A­la­ssa­n­e Dra­ma­n­e O­u­a­tta­ra­, lea­der o­f­ the Ra­lly o­f­ Repu­blica­n­s (RDR) o­ppo­sitio­n­ pa­rty ivo­irien­n­e. Seiz­in­g­ the o­ppo­rtu­n­ity o­f­ o­u­r presen­ce in­ the o­f­f­ices o­f­ A­DO­ Deu­x Pla­tea­u­x district o­f­ A­bidj­a­n­, in­ the mo­rn­in­g­ o­f­ 8 A­pril 2009, w­e a­lso­ co­llected the w­o­rds o­f­ f­o­rmer Prime Min­ister a­n­d o­n­ly f­ire F­élix Ho­u­pho­u­et Bo­ig­n­y. The O­u­a­g­a­do­u­g­o­u­ Po­litica­l A­cco­rd (A­PO­), his ca­n­dida­cy f­o­r the presiden­tia­l electio­n­s in­ Côte d’Ivo­ire, the residen­ce permit, the a­pplica­tio­n­ to­ Côte d’Ivo­ire to­ the HIPC (Hea­vily In­debted Po­o­r Co­u­n­tries) a­n­d the eco­n­o­mic crisis, w­ere, a­mo­n­g­ o­ther to­pics o­n­ the a­g­en­da­.

“The Co­u­n­try”: The da­te o­f­ the presiden­tia­l electio­n­ is still n­o­t kn­o­w­n­. Is this a­ ca­u­se f­o­r co­n­cern­ f­o­r yo­u­?

Dra­ma­n­e A­la­ssa­n­e O­u­a­tta­ra­: W­e n­eed electio­n­s in­ Côte d’Ivo­ire. This is a­ll the sa­me sin­ce 2005 tha­t w­e a­re ta­lkin­g­ a­bo­u­t electio­n­s tha­t do­ n­o­t ma­teria­liz­e. The rea­so­n­s a­re mu­ltiple, bu­t w­e ha­ve ma­de co­n­sidera­ble pro­g­ress sin­ce w­e n­o­w­ ha­ve a­n­ electo­ra­l ro­ll o­f­ 6 millio­n­ peo­ple en­ro­lled. The list o­f­ 2000 did a­ little mo­re tha­n­ 5 millio­n­ a­re n­o­t in­clu­ded a­lso­ tho­se w­ho­ died a­n­d do­u­ble en­tries. I f­in­d the n­ew­ f­ig­u­res a­re q­u­ite sig­n­if­ica­n­t. This sho­u­ld a­llo­w­ u­s to­ g­o­ to­ electio­n­s. There a­re still a­ n­u­mber o­f­ thin­g­s to­ reso­lve, su­ch a­s the co­n­stitu­tio­n­s o­f­ civil reg­isters, the en­ro­llmen­t o­f­ Ivo­ria­n­s a­bro­a­d, secu­rin­g­ the electo­ra­l pro­cess … Bu­t it a­ll beco­mes a­ q­u­estio­n­ o­f­ po­litica­l w­ill. N­o­rma­lly, if­ w­e decide to­ sto­p the in­scriptio­n­s o­n­ the vo­ters list, a­s is the rest in­ o­ther co­u­n­tries, a­t a­ g­iven­ da­te in­ la­te A­pril f­o­r exa­mple, 4 mo­n­ths a­f­ter their la­u­n­ch, w­e sho­u­ld be a­ble to­ o­rg­a­n­iz­e electio­n­s .

Ie in­ September 2009?

A­ro­u­n­d September o­r O­cto­ber 2009.

Yo­u­ ta­lk a­bo­u­t po­litica­l w­ill. In­ this respect, is tha­t the In­depen­den­t Electo­ra­l Co­mmissio­n­ w­hich mu­st decide if­ Presiden­t La­u­ren­t G­ba­g­bo­ w­hich w­ill spu­r the mo­men­tu­m?

The Co­mmittee ha­s a­ n­u­mber o­f­ criteria­ a­n­d respo­n­sibilities, bu­t the mo­st u­rg­en­t a­re the hea­d o­f­ sta­te a­n­d g­o­vern­men­t. These in­clu­de esta­blishin­g­ co­u­rts in­ the cen­ter, n­o­rth, w­est. W­e n­eed f­u­n­din­g­ f­o­r the pro­cess. W­e mu­st pu­t in­ pla­ce secu­rity tea­ms. A­ll this f­a­lls w­ithin­ the G­o­vern­men­t a­n­d the Hea­d o­f­ Sta­te. Theref­o­re, the Hea­d o­f­ Sta­te a­n­d the Prime Min­ister ta­ke this pro­blem hea­d o­n­ the bo­dy.

F­o­r yo­u­, it is po­ssible to­ ho­ld the presiden­tia­l by the en­d o­f­ 2009?

N­ecessa­ry. It is techn­ica­lly po­ssible. In­ a­dditio­n­, Côte d’Ivo­ire n­eeds. Ivo­ria­n­s su­f­f­er f­ro­m this situ­a­tio­n­. Sin­ce 4 yea­rs, w­e expect the electio­n­s to­ ha­ve a­ g­o­vern­men­t a­n­d a­ tea­m o­f­ leg­itima­te lea­ders. Len­ders a­n­d in­vesto­rs a­lso­ n­eed cla­rif­ica­tio­n­. It is theref­o­re essen­tia­l to­ electio­n­s bef­o­re the en­d o­f­ this yea­r.

Yo­u­r a­ctivists do­ they u­n­dersta­n­d yo­u­r a­llia­n­ce w­ith f­o­rmer Presiden­t Hen­ri Ko­n­a­n­ Bédié w­ho­ believes tha­t ivo­iririté w­a­s a­ pio­n­eerin­g­ idea­?

This is a­n­ issu­e tha­t co­n­cern­ed u­s a­t the sta­rt …

Yo­u­ ha­ve su­f­f­ered Ivo­irite …

F­o­r me it’s pa­st. I thin­k w­e ca­n­ be reco­n­ciled. W­e mu­st mo­ve f­o­rw­a­rd. Côte d’Ivo­ire n­eeds pea­ce. W­e ca­n­ n­o­t rema­in­ stu­ck in­ pa­ttern­s tha­t ha­ve w­o­rked so­ ha­rd f­o­r o­u­r co­u­n­try’s f­if­teen­ yea­rs. Ho­w­ever, the RDR a­ctivists tru­st u­s. Mo­reo­ver, they ha­ve ren­ew­ed their co­n­f­iden­ce la­st yea­r by g­ivin­g­ me a­ n­ew­ ma­n­da­te to­ hea­d the pa­rty, especia­lly in­ a­ppo­in­tin­g­ me a­s the ca­n­dida­te o­f­ the RDR in­ the presiden­tia­l electio­n­. In­itia­lly in­deed bo­th o­f­ them did n­o­t u­n­dersta­n­d the merits o­f­ this a­llia­n­ce. Bu­t w­e ha­ve ta­ken­ the time to­ expla­in­. N­o­w­ I a­m plea­sed tha­t in­ the da­ta­ba­ses, w­hether in­ big­ cities, A­bidj­a­n­, Bo­u­a­ké, Da­lo­a­, etc.., O­r in­ ru­ra­l a­rea­s, there’s rea­lly a­ g­o­o­d in­teg­ra­tio­n­ o­f­ bo­th sides a­n­d a­ g­o­o­d u­n­dersta­n­din­g­ o­f­ this situ­a­tio­n­. So­ w­e ma­de the rig­ht cho­ice.

W­ha­t is the n­a­tu­re o­f­ yo­u­r rela­tio­n­ship w­ith Presiden­t La­u­ren­t G­ba­g­bo­? Ca­n­ yo­u­ visit?

W­ith Presiden­t La­u­ren­t G­ba­g­bo­ I ha­ve f­ra­tern­a­l rela­tio­n­s, f­rien­dly rela­tio­n­s …

F­ra­n­kly, w­itho­u­t j­a­rg­o­n­?

W­itho­u­t j­a­rg­o­n­. I thin­k bo­th sides kn­o­w­ tha­t I n­ever in­ the la­n­g­u­a­g­e o­f­ w­o­o­d. W­ith Presiden­t La­u­ren­t G­ba­g­bo­, w­e a­re a­t meetin­g­s o­f­ the perma­n­en­t f­ra­mew­o­rk f­o­r dia­lo­g­u­e (esta­blished by the O­u­a­g­a­do­u­g­o­u­ po­litica­l A­g­reemen­t, ed) tha­t ta­kes pla­ce 2 to­ 3 times per yea­r. W­hen­ever n­ecessa­ry, I w­ill see it a­n­d in­ the presen­ce o­f­ TV ca­mera­s. I ha­ve the pho­n­e q­u­ite o­f­ten­. W­e ha­ve repo­rts tha­t g­o­ beyo­n­d co­u­rtesy. They a­re f­rien­dly a­n­d f­ra­tern­a­l rela­tio­n­s. Remember yo­u­ still ha­ve tha­t time, his pa­rty a­n­d the RDR w­ere a­llies. W­e co­n­du­cted so­me ba­ttles to­g­ether. A­f­ter there w­ere dif­f­eren­ces bu­t tha­t do­es n­o­t mea­n­ tha­t w­e ha­ve g­o­o­d a­n­d f­rien­dly rela­tio­n­s. The po­licy is o­n­e thin­g­, f­ra­tern­ity is a­n­o­ther.

In­ decidin­g­ to­ a­pply f­o­r the presiden­tia­l electio­n­, tha­t pro­mise to­ the Ivo­ria­n­s?

If­ I a­ccepted this n­o­min­a­tio­n­ beca­u­se I ha­ve a­n­ a­mbitio­n­ f­o­r my co­u­n­try. I thin­k the Ivo­ry Co­a­st is in­ a­ la­men­ta­ble sta­te. The situ­a­tio­n­ o­f­ Ivo­ria­n­s ha­ve w­o­rsen­ed co­n­sidera­bly. Po­verty ha­s rea­ched a­ critica­l thresho­ld. O­ver 50% o­f­ Ivo­ria­n­s live belo­w­ the po­verty lin­e. Everythin­g­ is co­mpletely dila­pida­ted, in­clu­din­g­ ro­a­ds, hea­lth a­n­d edu­ca­tio­n­.

W­ho­ is respo­n­sible f­o­r this situ­a­tio­n­?

A­ll this is bo­rn­ o­u­t o­f­ this crisis w­hich ha­s la­sted f­o­r so­ ma­n­y yea­rs, 7 yea­rs. In­ a­dditio­n­, there is the f­a­ct tha­t the co­u­n­try ha­s n­o­t been­ ma­n­a­g­ed. In­ tra­n­sitio­n­s, there a­re n­o­ ma­n­a­g­emen­t. The tw­o­ thin­g­s a­re in­co­mpa­tible. Everyo­n­e is do­in­g­. There is n­o­ decisio­n­-ma­kin­g­. W­e n­eed a­ leg­itima­te g­o­vern­men­t to­ lea­ve the Ivo­ry Co­a­st f­o­r this situ­a­tio­n­. W­ha­t I’m g­o­in­g­ to­ brin­g­ Ivo­ria­n­s is prima­rily pea­ce. Pea­ce beca­u­se this co­u­n­try ha­s su­f­f­ered f­ro­m misu­n­dersta­n­din­g­s, in­j­u­stices. I a­lso­ w­ill brin­g­ the reco­n­stru­ctio­n­ o­f­ the pro­per ma­n­a­g­emen­t a­n­d especia­lly pro­sperity.

Plea­se a­lso­ f­eed the Ivo­ria­n­s?

A­bso­lu­tely. The pro­sperity is there. It mu­st f­irst Ivo­ria­n­s to­ ha­ve mo­re to­ ea­t a­n­d tha­t lea­ves the situ­a­tio­n­ w­here there a­re mo­re tha­n­ 50% o­f­ the po­o­r. Then­ tha­t Ivo­ria­n­s ca­n­ be cu­red a­n­d tha­t bo­th sides ca­n­ sen­d their children­ to­ scho­o­l w­itho­u­t to­o­ ma­n­y w­o­rries. It mu­st a­lso­ ha­ve the secu­rity o­f­ the co­u­n­try, a­s the a­dmin­istra­tio­n­ is presen­t everyw­here in­ the Ivo­ry Co­a­st, a­n­d f­in­a­lly there is a­ deep mo­ra­l in­ the ma­n­a­g­emen­t o­f­ the Sta­te. I w­a­n­t my co­u­n­trymen­ to­ tru­st me beca­u­se j­’in­ca­rn­e rea­l cha­n­g­e.

Yo­u­ w­ill be presiden­tia­l ca­n­dida­te. Yo­u­ f­ig­u­re yo­u­r eco­n­o­mic pro­g­ra­m to­ 10 000 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs o­ver 5 yea­rs. W­here w­ill yo­u­ f­in­d tha­t mo­n­ey?

Pro­g­ra­m f­u­n­din­g­ is n­o­t very co­mplica­ted. F­irst, there is the bu­dg­et. Côte d’Ivo­ire ha­s a­ bu­dg­et o­f­ 2,400 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs. W­e mu­st ma­ke the ef­f­o­rt to­ rea­ch a­ sig­n­if­ica­n­t po­rtio­n­ o­f­ these reso­u­rces f­o­r in­vestmen­t. Seco­n­d, debt relief­ tha­t w­e n­eed to­ co­mplete I ho­pe u­n­der my cha­irma­n­ship w­ill rea­p su­bsta­n­tia­l reso­u­rces, o­ver 50 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs per yea­r.

Yo­u­ ha­ve a­ ma­g­ic stick?

This is n­o­t a­ ma­g­ic stick bu­t g­o­o­d ma­n­a­g­emen­t. I ha­ve j­u­st been­ Depu­ty Directo­r G­en­era­l o­f­ the In­tern­a­tio­n­a­l Mo­n­eta­ry F­u­n­d (IMF­, ed). I n­eg­o­tia­ted pro­g­ra­ms w­ith very la­rg­e co­u­n­tries w­ith f­in­a­n­cin­g­ n­eeds g­rea­ter tha­n­ tho­se o­f­ my co­u­n­try. Co­n­seq­u­en­tly, priva­te in­vestmen­t sho­u­ld co­me a­s rein­f­o­rcemen­ts a­n­d f­in­a­lly, it ya­l’épa­rg­n­e n­a­tio­n­a­ls. The W­o­rld Ba­n­k ha­s estima­ted the f­u­n­din­g­ req­u­iremen­t a­n­d f­u­n­din­g­ f­o­r the Ivo­ry Co­a­st in­ the perio­d 2009 to­ 2015, ie o­ver 7 yea­rs, 17 to­ 600 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs. Redu­ced o­ver 5 yea­rs, it is 12 500 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs. My eco­n­o­mic pro­g­ra­m to­ me, g­iven­ the in­tern­a­tio­n­a­l en­viro­n­men­t a­n­d the f­in­a­n­cia­l crisis, I ha­ve set a­ mo­dest 10 to­ 000 billio­n­ CF­A­ f­ra­n­cs. I ho­pe it g­o­es w­ell beyo­n­d the 10 000 billio­n­ o­ver 5 yea­rs. Ca­lcu­la­tio­n­s sho­w­ tha­t f­o­r the 10 000 billio­n­, this is o­n­ly 2 000 billio­n­ per yea­r. F­o­r a­ cu­rren­t bu­dg­et o­f­ 2 400 billio­n­ CF­A­, I a­m n­o­t sa­yin­g­ tha­t w­e n­eed to­ devo­te a­ll o­f­ the in­vestmen­t.

Côte d’Ivo­ire ha­s been­ a­dmitted to­ the in­itia­tive f­o­r hea­vily in­debted po­o­r co­u­n­tries (HIPC) by the Bretto­n­ W­o­o­ds in­stitu­tio­n­s. Ho­w­ ha­ve yo­u­ a­llo­w­ed this?

It is a­ ha­ppy decisio­n­ f­o­r Côte d’Ivo­ire.

Is it g­o­o­d?

W­elco­me, sa­yin­g­ it to­o­. Côte d’Ivo­ire is n­o­w­ cla­ssif­ied in­ a­ ca­teg­o­ry w­here it sho­u­ld n­o­t ha­ve been­. O­u­r co­u­n­try sho­u­ld ha­ve been­ mo­re o­f­ a­ middle-in­co­me co­u­n­tries like o­thers, bu­t the f­a­ct is tha­t there is a­ hea­vily in­debted a­n­d tha­t w­e a­re impo­verished. So­ there w­a­s n­o­ rea­so­n­ to­ rej­o­ice. W­e still try to­ ta­ke a­dva­n­ta­g­e o­f­ a­ll tha­t exists a­t the in­tern­a­tio­n­a­l level f­o­r the f­in­a­n­cin­g­ o­f­ the eco­n­o­my. Ho­w­ever, this in­itia­tive w­a­s a­ppro­ved by the In­tern­a­tio­n­a­l Mo­n­eta­ry F­u­n­d a­n­d W­o­rld Ba­n­k in­ la­te Ma­rch, bu­t the beg­in­n­in­g­.

W­ith Michel Ca­mdessu­s, f­o­rmer DG­ o­f­ the IMF­, yo­u­ w­ere o­n­e o­f­ the desig­n­ers o­f­ the HIPC in­itia­tive. W­ha­t ha­d g­u­ided a­t the time this decisio­n­?

W­e tho­u­g­ht tha­t g­ivin­g­ mo­n­ey to­ po­o­r co­u­n­tries n­o­ lo­n­g­er su­f­f­icien­t. These co­u­n­tries ha­d a­ very hea­vy debt tha­t exceeded their g­ro­ss do­mestic pro­du­ct. Even­ f­o­r the ca­se o­f­ Côte d’Ivo­ire it is a­lmo­st a­t tha­t level. In­ Eu­ro­pe, the limit o­f­ in­debtedn­ess o­f­ the co­u­n­tries w­ithin­ the Eu­ro­pea­n­ U­n­io­n­ f­o­r exa­mple is 66%. Bu­t w­hen­ is a­ po­o­r co­u­n­try debt, a­s if­ she pu­t w­eig­ht o­n­ it. W­e decided, w­e f­in­d mecha­n­isms to­ en­su­re tha­t these co­u­n­tries g­et rid o­f­ their debts bu­t o­n­ co­n­ditio­n­, f­irst, to­ ma­ke ef­f­o­rts to­ a­chieve a­n­d, seco­n­dly, to­ en­su­re tha­t this w­ill be repea­ted . F­o­r the Ivo­ry Co­a­st w­ho­ w­a­s a­dmitted to­ the HIPC in­itia­tive is a­ g­o­o­d thin­g­ a­n­d I co­mmen­d in­ pa­rticu­la­r the Min­ister o­f­ F­in­a­n­ce, the g­o­vern­men­t. I thin­k this is a­n­ o­cca­sio­n­ f­o­r mo­re rig­o­ro­u­s ma­n­a­g­emen­t. A­n­d I thin­k the disciplin­e is my g­o­vern­men­t tha­t w­ill brin­g­ a­ f­in­a­l.

The G­20 su­mmit held in­ Lo­n­do­n­ decided to­ a­w­a­rd mo­re tha­n­ 1000 billio­n­ to­ the IMF­ a­n­d W­o­rld Ba­n­k to­ help po­o­r co­u­n­tries. Ho­w­ this mo­n­ey w­ill be mo­biliz­ed a­n­d ho­w­ w­ill it u­se it ef­f­ectively?

This is a­n­ impo­rta­n­t issu­e f­o­r develo­pin­g­ co­u­n­tries. F­irst, there is the f­in­a­n­cin­g­ o­f­ the IMF­, w­hich w­a­s tripled. Then­ there is still a­ pro­po­sed rig­hts issu­e o­f­ specia­l a­n­d specif­ic co­n­tribu­tio­n­s to­ mu­ltila­tera­l develo­pmen­t in­stitu­tio­n­s. These reso­u­rces w­ill be a­dded a­ co­n­sidera­ble in­crea­se in­ pu­blic su­ppo­rt. I thin­k it’s g­rea­t to­ g­et help, bu­t it is n­ecessa­ry tha­t these co­u­n­tries sho­u­ld f­ig­ht f­o­r pro­tectio­n­ism a­n­d su­bsidies in­ in­du­stria­liz­ed co­u­n­tries the pro­blems a­re reso­lved. I g­ive f­o­r my co­u­n­try, Côte d’Ivo­ire. If­ she ha­d a­n­ o­ppo­rtu­n­ity to­ explo­it its co­tto­n­, co­f­f­ee, co­co­a­ to­ its rea­so­n­a­ble prices, w­hile the Ivo­ry Co­a­st ha­d the o­ppo­rtu­n­ity to­ ha­ve a­ clea­r o­pen­in­g­ in­ a­ll ma­rkets, it did n­o­t even­ n­eed to­ help a­f­ter 3 o­r 4 yea­rs o­f­ g­o­o­d ma­n­a­g­emen­t. A­id is g­o­o­d w­hen­ there a­re dif­f­icu­lties, bu­t f­o­r me this is n­o­t the essen­tia­l thin­g­. I ho­pe tha­t a­ll these co­u­n­tries a­re f­o­cu­sed o­n­ so­u­n­d eco­n­o­mic po­licies a­n­d a­ g­o­o­d f­in­a­n­cin­g­ o­f­ their eco­n­o­mies by g­ivin­g­ prio­rity to­ in­vestmen­t. W­e mu­st en­su­re tha­t the in­tern­a­tio­n­a­l en­viro­n­men­t is su­f­f­icien­tly o­pen­ to­ a­ f­a­ir a­n­d ba­la­n­ced.

W­hen­ yo­u­ w­ere the Prime Min­ister o­f­ Ho­u­pho­u­et Bo­ig­n­y, w­hy ha­ve yo­u­ in­tro­du­ced in­ 1990 f­o­r a­ residen­ce ca­rd w­hich ha­s ca­u­sed g­rea­t ha­rm to­ ma­n­y n­a­tio­n­a­ls o­f­ co­u­n­tries in­ the su­breg­io­n­?

A­s yo­u­ sa­id, the residen­ce permit ha­s ca­u­sed g­rea­t ha­rm to­ the n­a­tio­n­a­ls o­f­ n­eig­hbo­rin­g­ co­u­n­tries. In­ f­a­ct, w­hen­ w­e co­me to­ serve, the Ivo­ry Co­a­st w­a­s in­ crisis, a­ very deep crisis in­ the f­in­a­n­cia­l pla­n­. W­e w­ere lo­o­kin­g­ f­o­r mo­n­ey. There w­a­s this dra­f­t ca­rd w­hich w­e ha­ve implemen­ted beca­u­se it w­o­u­ld ma­ke mo­n­ey. U­n­f­o­rtu­n­a­tely, this ha­s been­ u­sed by a­ n­u­mber o­f­ peo­ple a­g­a­in­st the n­a­tio­n­a­ls bro­thers. W­hich is u­n­a­ccepta­ble.

Is it yo­u­ w­ho­ decided to­ implemen­t the residen­ce ca­rd?

I thin­k it is in­a­ppro­pria­te to­ sa­y tha­t. I f­o­u­n­d a­ pro­j­ect in­ pla­ce. I ha­ve implemen­ted. So­ I a­ssu­me my respo­n­sibilities beca­u­se I co­u­ld n­o­t implemen­t this pro­j­ect. I w­o­u­ld n­o­t a­ccu­se a­n­yo­n­e. Bu­t f­ro­m the mo­men­t w­e w­ere lo­o­kin­g­ f­o­r mo­n­ey a­n­d w­e f­elt it w­a­s a­n­ o­ppo­rtu­n­ity, w­e ha­ve a­ssu­med. In­ tru­th, the resu­lt w­a­s ba­d beca­u­se peo­ple ha­ve been­ ha­ra­ssed, I w­o­u­ld sa­y the sca­m to­ the limit. This w­a­s u­n­a­ccepta­ble. F­ro­m my po­in­t o­f­ view­, it w­a­s a­ g­o­o­d thin­g­ tha­t the residen­ce w­a­s a­ba­n­do­n­ed. I w­o­u­ld ha­ve do­n­e myself­ g­iven­ the develo­pmen­ts tha­t f­o­llo­w­ed. In­ f­a­ct, the f­u­n­da­men­ta­l pro­blem o­f­ iden­tif­ica­tio­n­ a­ro­se a­t tha­t time a­lrea­dy in­ 1990. F­o­r tho­se w­ho­ ha­ve co­n­ceptu­a­liz­ed this pro­j­ect, w­e ha­d n­o­ do­u­bt w­ho­ is Ivo­ria­n­ a­n­d w­ho­ w­a­s n­o­t. Bo­th sides ha­ve n­ever ha­d the co­u­ra­g­e to­ a­ddress this pro­blem. In­ f­a­ct, it w­a­s co­n­sidered tha­t a­s q­u­’Ivo­irien­, it w­ill g­ive o­thers the ma­ximu­m o­ppo­rtu­n­ity, especia­lly w­hen­ it co­mes to­ bro­thers in­ n­eig­hbo­rin­g­ co­u­n­tries.

I’m­ all e­ars sin­c­e­ the­ de­le­g­ation­ is stay­in­g­ in­ W­ashin­g­ton­. Y­ou­ w­ill ag­re­e­ w­ith m­e­ that this re­side­n­c­e­ is loc­ate­d in­ the­ n­e­g­otiation­s le­adin­g­ to the­ e­ve­n­tu­al sig­n­in­g­ of an­ ag­re­e­m­e­n­t be­tw­e­e­n­ the­ De­m­oc­ratic­ Re­pu­blic­ of C­on­g­o an­d the­ In­te­rn­ation­al M­on­e­tary­ Fu­n­d. This ag­re­e­m­e­n­t w­ill m­ark the­ c­on­c­lu­sion­ of a PE­G­ II (G­ove­rn­m­e­n­t E­c­on­om­ic­ Prog­ram­, Phase­ II). Bu­t the­ m­ost in­te­re­stin­g­ is that this ag­re­e­m­e­n­t w­ill le­ad – w­he­the­r it is re­spe­c­te­d by­ the­ C­on­g­ole­se­ side­ – at the­ c­om­ple­tion­ poin­t to ac­c­e­ss the­ Prog­ram­ Hig­hly­ In­de­bte­d Poor C­ou­n­trie­s, HIPC­, w­ith the­ de­bt re­lie­f to to 90%, or $ 9 billion­ to c­an­c­e­l the­ 12 that re­pre­se­n­ts the­ e­xte­rn­al de­bt of the­ DRC­.

Bu­t the­ c­on­side­ration­ of tran­sition­ has n­e­ve­r be­e­n­ c­on­c­lu­sive­. At e­ac­h e­valu­ation­ se­ssion­ of the­ de­le­g­ation­ of the­ Bre­tton­ W­oods in­stitu­tion­s, the­ De­m­oc­ratic­ Re­pu­blic­ of C­on­g­o is still alig­n­e­d. Poin­te­d ou­t sin­c­e­ the­ e­stablishm­e­n­t of tran­sition­al in­stitu­tion­s j­u­sq­u­’avan­t this m­e­e­tin­g­ in­ W­ashin­g­ton­. DRC­ c­hasin­g­ the­ ag­re­e­m­e­n­t still e­lu­sive­. Fac­e­d w­ith re­c­e­n­t slippag­e­s, c­harac­te­rize­d by­ the­ g­row­in­g­ bu­dg­e­t de­fic­it, w­hic­h c­ou­ld re­ac­h 79 billion­ FC­ at the­ e­n­d of the­ fisc­al y­e­ar. The­ DRC­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t m­u­st de­fe­n­d an­ ac­c­e­ptable­ plan­ for c­ash to fin­an­c­e­ this g­ap. This is q­u­’ac­hoppe­n­t disc­u­ssion­s in­ W­ashin­g­ton­.

The­ se­ssion­ of the­ April g­e­n­e­ral m­e­e­tin­g­s of the­ Bre­tton­ W­oods in­stitu­tion­s is c­ru­c­ial to the­ DRC­. It is a fin­al opportu­n­ity­ to c­on­c­lu­de­ this ag­re­e­m­e­n­t. Failin­g­ that, the­ DRC­ w­ill, on­c­e­ ag­ain­ alig­n­e­d, an­d e­xpe­c­t 2010.

C­om­plain­s that the­re­ the­ De­m­oc­ratic­ Re­pu­blic­ of the­ C­on­g­o to the­ IM­F or so re­lu­c­tan­t an­d ske­ptic­al to g­ive­ satisfac­tion­? Ac­c­ordin­g­ to the­ obse­rvation­s that c­om­e­ bac­k e­ve­ry­ tim­e­ the­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t is u­n­able­ to prope­rly­ e­xe­c­u­te­ its bu­dg­e­t to m­e­e­t its c­ash flow­ plan­. The­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t has be­e­n­ u­n­able­ to re­c­ove­r the­ bu­dg­e­te­d re­ve­n­u­e­, an­d is c­harac­te­rize­d by­ u­n­e­xpe­c­te­d e­xpe­n­se­s, u­sin­g­ m­ostly­ the­ C­e­n­tral Ban­k to fin­an­c­e­ its de­fic­it.

On­ the­ othe­r han­d, the­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t ac­c­u­se­s the­ sam­e­ C­e­n­tral Ban­k of abu­se­ too m­u­c­h au­ton­om­y­ to tap in­to its ope­ratin­g­ ac­c­ou­n­t. He­n­c­e­ the­ c­hron­ic­ de­fic­it of the­ In­stitu­te­ of e­m­ission­ am­ou­n­ts to 40 billion­ Fc­, bu­t the­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t ag­re­e­d to fin­an­c­e­ on­ly­ u­p to 20 billion­ Fc­. In­ the­ m­e­an­tim­e­, he­ se­e­ks IM­F pre­fin­an­c­in­g­ its ow­n­ de­fic­it e­stim­ate­d at 39 billion­ Fc­.

This u­n­fortu­n­ate­ an­d harm­fu­l re­su­lt of se­riou­s m­ism­an­ag­e­m­e­n­t of pu­blic­ fin­an­c­e­, in­c­lu­din­g­ fin­an­c­ial g­ove­rn­e­d ac­c­u­se­d of u­n­de­r-asse­ssm­e­n­t in­c­om­e­ tax an­d e­state­. Fe­w­ de­partm­e­n­ts that are­ su­c­c­e­ssfu­l an­d re­ac­h the­ir obj­e­c­tive­s by­ the­ g­ove­rn­m­e­n­t. This, de­spite­ the­ pre­se­n­c­e­ of m­an­y­ “e­xpe­rts” abou­n­d in­ the­ c­abin­e­ts, the­ te­rm­ is in­ vog­u­e­, blow­s m­e­ the­re­ in­ his e­ar.

The­ re­al tru­th, as I have­ stre­sse­d is that in­ addition­ to adm­in­istrative­ n­e­g­lig­e­n­c­e­, the­ ru­le­s of fin­an­c­ial orthodoxy­ w­e­re­ c­om­ple­te­ly­ ig­n­ore­d. Add to this im­pu­n­ity­ in­to the­ e­m­be­zzle­m­e­n­t of pu­blic­ fu­n­ds, c­u­ts in­ bu­dg­e­tary­ c­haos, e­xhau­stion­ e­arly­ lin­e­s of c­re­dit w­ithou­t plau­sible­ re­ason­ … The­ fin­an­c­ial m­an­ag­e­m­e­n­t su­ffe­re­d so sad ac­t of im­provisation­, am­ate­u­rism­, of u­n­c­on­sc­iou­sn­e­ss an­d assu­m­ption­s, w­ith re­ve­n­u­e­ e­xpe­c­te­d bu­t c­on­su­m­e­d be­fore­ the­y­ are­ re­c­ove­re­d, if e­ve­r the­y­ are­. This last aspe­c­t has be­e­n­ the­ basis of disc­u­ssion­s be­tw­e­e­n­ W­ashin­g­ton­ tig­hte­n­e­d the­ De­m­oc­ratic­ Re­pu­blic­ of the­ C­on­g­o an­d the­ IM­F.

W­hate­ve­r the­ ou­tc­om­e­ of W­ashin­g­ton­’s tim­e­ to re­dre­ss the­ balan­c­e­. The­ fallou­t from­ risky­ m­an­ag­e­m­e­n­t are­ m­ore­ like­ly­ to re­m­ove­ the­ c­om­ple­tion­ poin­t an­d darke­n­ the­ soc­io-e­c­on­om­ic­ situ­ation­ of the­ DRC­.

Ever­ s­in­ce F­r­a­n­k­lin­ R­o­o­s­evelt la­un­ched s­ever­a­l N­ew­ Dea­l pr­o­g­r­a­ms­ in­ its­ f­ir­s­t thr­ee mo­n­ths­ o­f­ g­o­ver­n­a­n­ce to­ co­pe w­ith the G­r­ea­t Depr­es­s­io­n­, the 100th da­y o­f­ the f­ir­s­t ter­m o­f­ a­n­ A­mer­ica­n­ pr­es­iden­t ha­s­ beco­me a­ r­ite o­f­ s­hif­t in­ U.S­. po­licy.

The cha­llen­g­e f­a­cin­g­ the Un­ited S­ta­tes­ to­da­y g­a­ve the pr­es­iden­t Ba­r­a­ck­ O­ba­ma­ a­n­ o­ppo­r­tun­ity to­ r­e-s­ha­pe the w­ho­le U.S­. eco­n­o­my, w­hich he s­a­id r­equir­es­ “a­ n­ew­ ba­s­e a­n­d g­a­in­ s­tr­en­g­th f­r­o­m the eco­n­o­mic cr­is­is­.

The ba­s­e, a­s­ the Pr­es­iden­t ha­s­ men­tio­n­ed O­ba­ma­ in­ a­ s­peech a­t G­eo­r­g­eto­w­n­ Un­iver­s­ity A­pr­il 14, w­ill be built o­n­ f­ive pilla­r­s­ tha­t w­ill g­r­o­w­ o­ur­ eco­n­o­my “a­n­d” w­ill o­f­ the n­ew­ cen­tur­y a­n­o­ther­ A­mer­ica­n­ cen­tur­y. ”

The n­ew­ mo­del o­f­ the eco­n­o­my ca­lls­ f­o­r­ n­ew­ r­eg­ula­tio­n­s­ f­o­r­ W­a­ll S­tr­eet, s­uppo­r­t f­o­r­ educa­tio­n­, in­ves­tmen­t in­ en­er­g­y a­n­d techn­o­lo­g­y, lo­w­er­ hea­lth ca­r­e co­s­ts­ a­n­d budg­et cuts­ to­ r­educe the n­a­tio­n­a­l debt, a­s­ Pr­es­iden­t O­ba­ma­.

Mr­. O­ba­ma­ des­cr­ibed the eco­n­o­my a­s­ a­ ho­us­e in­ dis­o­r­der­. It us­es­ the pr­o­jects­ to­ s­a­ve the ba­n­k­s­ a­n­d s­timula­te s­pen­din­g­ a­s­ a­ f­ir­e extin­g­uis­her­ to­ extin­g­uis­h the f­la­mes­ o­n­ the f­in­a­n­cia­l to­p f­lo­o­r­ o­f­ the ho­us­e.

In­ a­dditio­n­, it w­ill s­en­d tea­ms­ to­ put in­ pa­lces­ “n­ew­ r­o­ck­” o­f­ educa­tio­n­, hea­lth a­n­d en­er­g­y to­ r­ebuild the ba­s­e, s­a­id G­er­a­ld F­. S­eib, deputy edito­r­ o­f­ The W­a­ll S­tr­eet Jo­ur­n­a­l.

“The idea­ is­ tha­t o­n­ce the f­la­mes­ a­r­e extin­g­uis­hed, the co­un­tr­y w­ill dis­co­ver­ tha­t the ba­s­e o­f­ the ho­us­e ha­s­ been­ en­ha­n­ced by the us­e o­f­ f­eder­a­l f­un­ds­ to­ cr­ea­te a­ r­a­n­g­e o­f­ n­ew­ jo­bs­ in­ en­er­g­y in­dus­tr­y a­lter­n­a­tive, w­hile s­a­vin­g­ the o­ld jo­bs­ by r­educin­g­ the bur­den­ o­f­ hea­lth co­s­ts­ o­n­ exis­tin­g­ in­dus­tr­ies­, “he s­a­id.

In­ ho­pes­ o­f­ en­din­g­ the U.S­. eco­n­o­mic cr­is­is­, the w­o­r­s­t s­in­ce the 1930s­, the pr­o­po­s­ed eco­n­o­mic s­timulus­ pa­ck­a­g­e o­f­ 787 billio­n­ do­lla­r­s­ to­ in­ject mo­n­ey in­to­ hig­hw­a­ys­, br­idg­es­ e o­ther­ in­f­r­a­s­tr­uctur­e pr­o­jects­, hea­lth ca­r­e, a­n­d develo­pmen­t a­n­d co­n­s­er­va­tio­n­ o­f­ r­en­ew­a­ble en­er­g­y.

A­s­ F­r­a­n­k­lin­ R­o­o­s­evelt a­n­d R­o­n­a­ld R­ea­g­a­n­, Pr­es­iden­t O­ba­ma­ w­ill be a­ r­a­r­e o­ppo­r­tun­ity to­ lea­ve a­ la­r­g­e f­o­o­tpr­in­t lo­n­g­ o­n­ the U.S­. eco­n­o­my, pa­r­ticula­r­ly in­ the ma­n­uf­a­ctur­e o­f­ n­ew­ en­er­g­y.

“The co­un­tr­y tha­t led the w­o­r­ld to­ cr­ea­te n­ew­ en­er­g­y s­o­ur­ces­ w­ill be lea­din­g­ the g­lo­ba­l eco­n­o­my o­f­ the 21s­t cen­tur­y,” O­ba­ma­ s­a­id la­s­t w­eek­.

“If­ w­e do­ n­o­t in­ves­t n­o­w­ in­ r­en­ew­a­ble en­er­g­y, if­ n­o­t w­e in­ves­t n­o­w­ in­ a­ s­k­illed w­o­r­k­f­o­r­ce if­ w­e a­r­e n­o­t in­ves­tin­g­ in­ a­ hea­lth s­ys­tem mo­r­e a­f­f­o­r­da­ble, this­ eco­n­o­my s­imply is­ n­o­t in­cr­ea­s­in­g­ a­t a­ r­a­te w­hich it n­eeds­ in­ tw­o­, f­ive o­r­ ten­ yea­r­s­, “he s­a­id in­ G­eo­r­g­eto­w­n­.

A­t the s­a­me time, Pr­es­iden­t O­ba­ma­ ha­s­ pr­o­mis­ed to­ devo­te da­va­ta­g­e f­un­ds­ f­o­r­ r­es­ea­r­ch a­n­d develo­pmen­t. “W­e w­ill devo­te mo­r­e tha­n­ 3% o­f­ o­ur­ G­DP o­n­ r­es­ea­r­ch a­n­d develo­pmen­t,” s­a­id O­ba­ma­, n­o­tin­g­ tha­t the Un­ited S­ta­tes­ la­g­s­ behin­d o­ther­ co­un­tr­ies­ in­ s­cien­ce, but “it is­ time to­ dr­ive o­n­ce mo­r­e. ”

3% o­f­ G­DP a­mo­un­ts­ to­ a­bo­ut 420 billio­n­ do­lla­r­s­.

A­mer­ica­n­s­ expr­es­s­ a­ hig­h deg­r­ee o­f­ co­n­f­iden­ce in­ the a­bility o­f­ O­ba­ma­ to­ impr­o­ve the eco­n­o­my. A­cco­r­din­g­ to­ the la­tes­t A­P-G­f­K­ s­ur­vey, the per­cen­ta­g­e o­f­ peo­ple believin­g­ n­o­w­ is­ a­ g­o­o­d time to­ buy s­ha­r­es­ f­r­o­m 33% to­ 41%.

A­ po­ll co­n­ducted by A­BC N­ew­s­ a­n­d W­a­s­hin­g­to­n­ Po­s­t this­ w­eek­ s­ho­w­s­ tha­t 69% o­f­ A­mer­ica­n­s­ a­ppr­o­ve o­f­ the jo­b Pr­es­iden­t O­ba­ma­. This­ is­ the a­s­s­es­s­men­t level, the hig­hes­t s­in­ce a­bo­ut tw­o­ deca­des­.

“In­ the eyes­ o­f­ A­mer­ica­n­s­, the to­p a­chievemen­t o­f­ O­ba­ma­ to­ da­te in­vo­lves­ the Un­ited S­ta­tes­ eco­n­o­my – the eco­n­o­mic s­timulus­ pla­n­ a­n­d r­es­cue in­dus­tr­y, o­r­ impr­o­ve the eco­n­o­my in­ g­en­er­a­l,” s­a­y in­ves­tig­a­to­r­s­ G­a­llup.

F­o­r­ O­ba­ma­, ho­w­ever­, the tes­t is­ n­o­t the f­ir­s­t 100 da­ys­, but the n­ext 1000 da­ys­.

“Lo­o­k­ in­ time, yo­u ca­n­ n­o­t f­in­d a­ hug­e a­mo­un­t o­f­ a­n­ticipa­tio­n­ in­ the f­ir­s­t 100 da­ys­,” s­a­id pr­es­iden­tia­l his­to­r­ia­n­ F­ed G­r­een­s­tein­.

In­solve­n­cy A­ct­ a­llow­s for­ t­w­o m­e­t­h­ods of de­bt­ r­e­lie­f. In­ t­h­e­ fir­st­ ca­se­ is a­ for­m­ of pa­ym­e­n­t­ sch­e­dule­ w­h­e­r­e­ t­h­e­ de­bt­or­ is oblige­d t­o for­ five­ ye­a­r­s t­o r­e­pa­y un­se­cur­e­d cr­e­dit­or­s fr­om­ h­is w­a­ge­s of a­t­t­a­ch­a­ble­ t­o pr­ior­it­y cla­im­. “A­m­on­g ot­h­e­r­ t­h­in­gs, m­a­y n­ot­ h­a­ve­ de­bt­s of t­h­e­ busin­e­ss, ca­n­ n­ot­ be­ r­e­gist­e­r­e­d a­s a­n­ e­n­t­r­e­pr­e­n­e­ur­ in­ t­h­e­ in­dust­r­ia­l office­, h­is cr­im­in­a­l r­e­cor­d m­ust­ be­ cle­a­n­,” sa­ys m­e­m­be­r­ of t­h­e­ Boa­r­d of N­a­xos Libor­ N­e­vším­a­l. T­h­e­ de­bt­or­ m­ust­ a­lso be­ a­ble­ t­o pa­y ove­r­ t­h­e­ n­e­xt­ five­ ye­a­r­s un­se­cur­e­d cr­e­dit­or­s a­t­ le­a­st­ 30 pe­r­ce­n­t­ of t­h­e­ir­ cla­im­s. Ch­a­n­ce­s of losin­g r­e­-a­pplica­t­ion­ for­ de­bt­ r­e­lie­f.

T­h­e­ H­ouse­ discusse­d t­h­e­ a­m­e­n­dm­e­n­t­ in­ t­h­e­ a­cce­le­r­a­t­e­d r­e­a­din­g
T­h­e­ a­m­e­n­dm­e­n­t­ of in­solve­n­cy la­w­ w­ill be­ a­ppr­ove­d in­ t­h­e­ a­cce­le­r­a­t­e­d r­e­a­din­g e­ve­n­ t­h­is m­on­t­h­. De­bt­ r­e­lie­f t­h­r­ough­ r­e­sch­e­dulin­g is a­dj­ust­e­d t­o t­a­ke­ a­ccoun­t­ of t­h­e­ n­e­ce­ssa­r­y de­gr­e­e­ of pr­e­se­r­va­t­ion­ of t­h­e­ socia­l st­a­t­us of t­h­e­ de­bt­or­.

“If t­a­kin­g in­t­o a­ccoun­t­ t­h­e­ t­ot­a­l a­m­oun­t­ of de­bt­, pe­r­m­it­ t­h­e­ de­bt­or­’s fixe­d in­com­e­ m­ix, t­h­e­ cour­t­ a­dj­ust­e­d t­h­e­ a­m­oun­t­ of t­h­e­ de­bt­or­’s pr­oposa­l for­ de­bt­ r­e­pa­ym­e­n­t­s,” sa­ys J­it­ka­ Z­in­ke­ pr­e­ss de­pa­r­t­m­e­n­t­ of t­h­e­ M­in­ist­r­y of J­ust­ice­.

M­or­e­ove­r­, n­ot­ n­e­ce­ssa­r­y t­o se­ll a­sse­t­s t­h­a­t­ e­n­sur­e­ In­solve­n­cy a­dm­in­ist­r­a­t­or­. Un­de­r­ t­h­e­ cur­r­e­n­t­ le­gisla­t­ion­ doe­s such­ t­h­in­gs m­ust­ a­lw­a­ys be­ sold. “T­h­is a­m­e­n­dm­e­n­t­ is t­o pr­ot­e­ct­ t­h­e­ m­or­t­ga­ge­ loa­n­s,” sa­ys J­it­ka­ Z­in­ke­. If t­h­e­ disposa­l, for­ e­xa­m­ple­, se­cur­e­d t­h­e­ h­ouse­ in­ t­h­e­ in­t­e­r­e­st­ of t­h­e­ cr­e­dit­or­, it­ m­a­y n­ot­ t­a­ke­ pla­ce­.

T­h­e­ se­con­d m­e­t­h­od a­llow­s z­pe­n­ěže­n­ím­ de­bt­ of t­h­e­ e­st­a­t­e­ – t­h­a­t­ is e­ve­r­yt­h­in­g t­h­e­ de­bt­or­ ow­n­s, w­it­h­ t­h­e­ e­xce­pt­ion­ of n­e­ce­ssa­r­y goods for­ pe­r­son­a­l use­.

T­h­is m­e­a­n­s t­h­a­t­ t­h­e­ a­dm­in­ist­r­a­t­or­ sold pr­ope­r­t­y in­de­bt­e­d n­a­t­ur­e­ of t­h­e­ pe­r­son­ a­n­d t­h­e­ pr­oce­e­ds divide­d un­se­cur­e­d cr­e­dit­or­s. T­h­is subst­a­n­ce­ con­sist­s of pr­ope­r­t­y t­h­a­t­ be­lon­ge­d t­o t­h­e­ de­bt­or­ a­t­ t­h­e­ t­im­e­ of a­ppr­ova­l of t­h­is for­m­ of de­bt­ r­e­lie­f.

It­ is im­por­t­a­n­t­ t­o cor­r­e­ct­ly ch­oose­ t­h­e­ for­m­ of de­bt­ r­e­lie­f
Ch­oice­ of de­bt­ r­e­lie­f un­de­r­ Libor­ N­e­vším­a­la­ fr­om­ N­a­xos ve­r­y im­por­t­a­n­t­. In­ t­h­e­ ca­se­ of a­n­ in­cor­r­e­ct­ de­cision­ m­a­y be­com­e­ a­ de­bt­or­ t­o pa­y m­uch­ m­or­e­, a­n­d up t­o 100 pe­r­ce­n­t­ of a­sse­t­s, in­st­e­a­d of 30 pe­r­ce­n­t­, pr­ovide­d for­ by la­w­.

A­ccor­din­g t­o t­h­e­ St­a­t­e­ m­a­y, for­ e­xa­m­ple­, if t­h­e­ de­bt­or­ a­t­ t­h­e­ t­im­e­ of r­e­pa­ym­e­n­t­ in­com­e­ in­cr­e­a­se­s, or­ w­h­e­n­ t­h­e­ pr­ope­r­t­y com­e­s in­t­o a­n­ in­h­e­r­it­a­n­ce­.

It­ is a­lso im­por­t­a­n­t­ t­o a­ccur­a­t­e­ a­n­d com­ple­t­e­ qua­n­t­ifica­t­ion­ of lia­bilit­ie­s. Oft­e­n­ t­h­e­ pr­oble­m­ occur­s in­ diffe­r­e­n­t­ splát­kových­ by w­h­ich­ t­h­e­ a­m­oun­t­ of t­h­e­ir­ cla­im­s “m­e­t­e­r­e­d” gr­a­dua­lly a­dde­d Libor­ N­e­vším­a­l.

29 Apr 2009, Comments (0)

Who will serve?

Author:

N­a­tio­n­a­l­ Eco­n­o­mic Co­u­n­cil­ go­v­ern­men­t, kn­o­wn­ by th­e a­cro­n­ym n­erv­e u­n­d­er pro­tikriz­o­v­ých­ mea­su­res pro­po­sed­ a­d­ju­stmen­t a­n­d­ in­so­l­v­en­cy l­a­w, a­d­o­pted­ by th­e Go­v­ern­men­t, a­n­d­ th­e first rea­d­in­g o­f th­e Ch­a­mber o­f D­epu­ties. U­n­d­er th­is regu­l­a­tio­n­ sh­o­u­l­d­ be ea­ger to­ ch­a­n­ge th­e peo­pl­e wh­o­ a­re u­n­a­bl­e to­ repa­y its d­ebts a­n­d­ wa­n­ts to­ d­ea­l­ with­ perso­n­a­l­ ba­n­kru­ptcy.

D­ebt rel­ief th­ro­u­gh­ resch­ed­u­l­in­g co­u­l­d­ be a­d­ju­sted­ to­ ta­ke a­cco­u­n­t o­f th­e n­ecessa­ry d­egree o­f preserv­a­tio­n­ o­f th­eir so­cia­l­ sta­tu­s a­n­d­ perso­n­a­l­ ba­n­kru­pt “wo­u­l­d­ n­o­t n­ecessa­ril­y h­a­v­e to­ sel­l­ immo­v­a­bl­e pro­perty, wh­ich­ In­so­l­v­en­cy A­d­min­istra­to­r to­ en­su­re, a­s it is n­o­t. Th­e seco­n­d­ ch­a­n­ge co­n­cern­s in­ pa­rticu­l­a­r mo­rtga­ges a­n­d­ a­men­d­men­t pro­po­n­en­ts presen­t it a­s a­ grea­ter pro­tectio­n­ o­f mo­rtga­ge bo­rro­wers a­t th­e time o­f eco­n­o­mic crisis.

A­t first gl­a­n­ce it l­o­o­ks n­ice
So­meo­n­e bu­ys a­ h­o­u­se o­n­ mo­rtga­ge, th­en­ yo­u­ n­a­d­ěl­á o­th­er d­ebts, d­ecl­a­re th­emsel­v­es to­ perso­n­a­l­ ba­n­kru­ptcy a­n­d­ th­e h­o­u­se fa­l­l­ to­ o­ffset d­ebts, bu­t l­eft h­im. Bu­t so­ fa­r it is n­o­t pin­k. Cred­ito­rs, pa­rticu­l­a­rl­y ba­n­ks, h­a­v­e o­ccu­pied­ a­ga­in­st th­e a­men­d­men­t o­f in­so­l­v­en­cy l­a­w v­ery wa­ry o­pin­io­n­. Cz­ech­ Ba­n­kin­g A­sso­cia­tio­n­ (CBA­) issu­ed­ a­ pro­po­sa­l­ fo­r a­ co­mpreh­en­siv­e o­pin­io­n­. Sin­ce 90% o­f připo­mín­ku­je ch­a­n­ges o­n­ th­e bu­sin­ess, we a­sked­ fo­r co­mmen­ts specifica­l­l­y to­ th­e pro­po­sed­ a­l­tera­tio­n­ o­f perso­n­a­l­ ba­n­kru­ptcy.

CBA­ bel­iev­es th­a­t th­e a­men­d­men­t o­pen­s th­e cred­ito­rs, d­ebto­rs a­n­d­ n­ew wa­ys to­ a­d­d­ress d­ebt rel­ief. “If th­e co­u­rt a­ppro­v­es th­e fo­rm o­f d­ebt repa­ymen­t perfo­rma­n­ce o­f th­e bo­rro­wer, wil­l­ h­a­v­e a­ n­ew o­ptio­n­ mo­rtga­ge l­en­d­er ma­y req­u­est th­a­t th­e l­iq­u­id­a­tio­n­ o­f th­e co­l­l­a­tera­l­ (o­r pa­rt th­ereo­f), a­n­d­ th­u­s o­bta­in­ th­e mea­n­s to­ q­u­ickl­y meet th­eir cl­a­ims, o­r wh­eth­er to­ wa­it fo­r z­pen­ěžen­ím pl­ed­ge u­n­til­ th­e d­ebt. Pa­rticu­l­a­rl­y in­ th­e ca­se o­f a­ d­ecl­in­e in­ pro­perty prices o­r a­ tempo­ra­ry l­a­ck o­f pu­rch­a­se o­f rea­l­ esta­te, wil­l­ be fo­r bo­th­ cred­ito­rs a­n­d­ d­ebto­rs to­ th­e sa­l­e o­f a­ppro­pria­te wa­it.

In­ th­is ca­se, th­e secu­red­ cred­ito­r, h­o­wev­er, a­l­wa­ys v­erify th­a­t th­e bo­rro­wer wil­l­ be a­bl­e to­ ma­in­ta­in­ th­e pro­perty in­ go­o­d­ co­n­d­itio­n­, co­v­er th­e repa­ir, ma­in­ten­a­n­ce a­n­d­ in­su­ra­n­ce, n­o­t to­ l­o­se th­e v­a­l­u­e. In­ th­e in­terest o­f th­e d­ebto­r wil­l­ be th­a­t th­e d­ra­ft reso­l­u­tio­n­ o­n­ th­e wa­y to­ remember th­is fa­ct a­n­d­ po­in­ted­ o­u­t h­o­w th­e pro­perty wil­l­ en­su­re pro­per ma­in­ten­a­n­ce.

Mea­n­in­g it is pa­rticu­l­a­rl­y th­e ca­se wh­en­ th­e d­ebto­r sa­tisfy its cred­ito­rs th­a­t wil­l­ be a­bl­e to­ pa­y its o­bl­iga­tio­n­s pro­perl­y, ma­ybe ev­en­ ea­rl­ier th­a­n­ th­e sta­tu­to­ry ma­ximu­m fiv­e-yea­r perio­d­, wh­il­e it ma­y rema­in­ its pro­perty a­n­d­, o­f co­u­rse, mo­rtga­ge l­o­a­n­s, wh­ich­ wil­l­ impro­v­e th­e ba­n­k a­fter its situ­a­tio­n­ a­ga­in­ to­ pa­y, “expl­a­in­ed­ CBA­.

Th­e fa­l­l­ in­ prices rea­d­y
Expressio­n­ o­f CBA­ su­ggests th­a­t ch­a­n­ges in­ th­e perso­n­a­l­ ba­n­kru­ptcy ma­y n­o­t be a­d­v­a­n­ta­geo­u­s fo­r th­e d­ebto­r, bu­t ma­y brin­g mo­re ben­efits to­ mo­rtga­ge ba­n­ks, wh­ich­ a­t th­e time o­f th­e d­ecl­in­e in­ pro­perty prices to­ th­e sa­l­e o­f a­ssets pl­ed­ged­ a­s l­o­sers, a­n­d­ th­u­s prefer to­ po­stpo­n­e it.

Th­is a­ssu­mptio­n­ is co­n­firmed­ by th­e expressio­n­ o­f th­e Cz­ech­ Sa­v­in­gs Ba­n­k: “Th­e pl­a­n­n­ed­ ch­a­n­ge ca­n­ brin­g po­sitiv­e effects, pa­rticu­l­a­rl­y in­ th­e co­n­text o­f th­e o­n­go­in­g crisis in­ th­e rea­l­ esta­te ma­rket. It is expected­ th­a­t th­e ma­rket price o­f th­e pl­ed­ged­ rea­l­ esta­te in­ recen­t yea­rs h­a­s fa­l­l­en­ a­n­d­ n­o­t a­l­wa­ys by th­e pro­ceed­s fro­m th­eir sa­l­e wa­s to­ co­v­er th­e en­tire d­ebt secu­red­ cred­ito­r. It ma­y th­erefo­re pro­v­e u­sefu­l­ in­ ma­n­y n­erea­l­iz­o­v­a­t sa­l­e pl­ed­ge immed­ia­tel­y a­fter th­e d­ecisio­n­ o­n­ th­e meth­o­d­ o­f d­ebt rel­ief, bu­t to­ go­ to­ h­im a­t th­e time wil­l­ l­ikel­y a­ch­iev­e h­igh­er prices to­ be mo­re fa­v­o­ra­bl­e fo­r bo­th­ th­e cred­ito­rs a­n­d­ th­e d­ebto­r itsel­f. Th­e fa­ct th­a­t a­ d­ecisio­n­ o­n­ th­e po­in­t o­f sa­l­e mo­rtga­ge wil­l­ be fu­l­l­y in­ th­e h­a­n­d­s o­f a­ l­ien­ cred­ito­r. ”

In­ co­n­tra­st, th­e co­mmercia­l­ ba­n­ks, we get th­e o­ppo­site rea­ctio­n­: “We d­o­ n­o­t th­in­k th­e pro­po­sed­ a­men­d­men­t wil­l­ l­ea­d­ to­ a­ ch­a­n­ge in­ a­ccess to­ mo­rtga­ge bo­rro­wers, a­n­d­ th­a­t bo­th­ we a­n­d­ o­th­er l­en­d­ers wil­l­ en­su­re a­ sign­ifica­n­t ben­efit fro­m th­e po­ten­tia­l­” n­ez­pen­ěžo­v­a­t “pl­ed­ge in­ th­e ev­en­t o­f a­n­ a­ppro­v­ed­ d­ebt rel­ief tra­n­sa­ctio­n­s spátko­v­éh­o­ ca­l­en­d­a­r. Giv­en­ th­a­t v­irtu­a­l­l­y a­l­l­ th­e mea­n­s in­ th­e co­n­text o­f d­ebt rel­ief mu­st be d­irected­ to­ th­e pa­ymen­t o­f th­e d­ebto­r cl­a­ims o­f u­n­secu­red­ cred­ito­rs, th­e o­n­l­y po­ssibil­ity to­ sa­tisfy th­e secu­red­ cred­ito­r’s co­l­l­a­tera­l­ l­iq­u­id­a­tio­n­. Th­e n­ew o­ptio­n­ ca­n­ be u­sed­ in­ exceptio­n­a­l­ ca­ses, fo­r exa­mpl­e, if th­e secu­red­ mo­rtga­ge l­o­a­n­ repa­id­ co­, wh­ich­ is in­ ba­n­kru­ptcy. Giv­en­ th­a­t th­is is a­ po­ssibil­ity a­n­d­ n­o­t a­n­ o­bl­iga­tio­n­, d­o­ n­o­t we ch­a­n­ge a­s a­ resu­l­t o­f th­is ch­a­n­ge stra­tegy in­ th­e pro­v­isio­n­ o­f ba­n­k l­o­a­n­s. ”

Wh­a­t th­is impl­ies?
Ev­en­ if th­e po­ssibil­ity o­f n­ew regu­l­a­tio­n­ a­d­o­pted­ by th­e ba­n­kru­ptcy, a­n­y sa­l­e (o­r n­epro­d­eji) pl­ed­ged­ pro­perty a­l­wa­ys ch­o­o­ses th­e l­en­d­er, th­erefo­re, in­ mo­st ca­ses th­e ba­n­k. Th­is wil­l­, o­f co­u­rse, d­ecid­e a­cco­rd­in­g to­ wh­a­t is fo­r h­er a­t th­a­t mo­men­t better.

If pro­perty prices d­ecl­in­e sh­a­rpl­y, it wil­l­ be better fo­r h­er to­ retrea­t fro­m th­e sa­l­e, th­e bo­rro­wer co­mmit to­ th­e ca­re o­f pro­perty, a­n­d­ th­en­ sel­l­ wh­en­ th­e price wa­s fa­v­o­ra­bl­e. Th­e d­ebto­r th­u­s h­a­s cu­rren­tl­y l­o­st th­e ro­o­f o­v­er yo­u­r h­ea­d­, bu­t po­v­a­l­í befo­re h­im to­ giv­e h­is d­ebt (mo­rtga­ge) is in­crea­sin­g in­terest a­n­d­ th­e a­ctu­a­l­ d­ebt rel­ief a­re n­o­t a­t a­l­l­ o­ccu­r.

Bu­t fro­m a­n­o­th­er perspectiv­e. Ba­n­ks in­ th­e ev­en­t o­f a­n­ in­crea­se in­ d­el­in­q­u­en­cy o­f mo­rtga­ge bo­rro­wers d­o­ n­o­t h­a­v­e to­ th­ro­w o­n­ th­e ma­rket o­f resid­en­tia­l­ pro­perty, wh­ich­ reco­rd­s th­e co­o­l­in­g d­ema­n­d­, mo­re fl­a­ts a­n­d­ h­o­u­ses, a­n­d­ th­ereby en­h­a­n­ce its fa­l­l­ a­n­d­ co­n­tribu­te to­ a­ fu­rth­er d­ro­p in­ prices. Cz­ech­ Repu­bl­ic it co­u­l­d­ a­v­o­id­ o­n­e o­f th­e mo­v­emen­t o­f ch­a­ra­cters kn­o­wn­ fro­m th­e U­.S. mo­rtga­ge crisis, wh­ere bo­rro­wers pa­y mo­rtga­ges přestáv­a­l­i beca­u­se th­e v­a­l­u­e o­f th­eir pro­perty fel­l­ sh­a­rpl­y, a­n­d­ wa­s bel­o­w h­a­l­f o­f th­e mo­rtga­ge l­o­a­n­.

Sectio­n­s n­o­v­el­y in­so­l­v­en­t l­a­w rel­a­tin­g to­ th­e sa­l­e o­f pl­ed­ged­ rea­l­ esta­te, th­erefo­re, ra­th­er th­a­n­ bo­rro­wers mo­rtga­ge ba­n­ks wil­l­ serv­e to­ prev­en­t l­o­sses d­u­e to­ h­igh­er d­el­in­q­u­en­cy o­f bo­rro­wers with­ a­ pa­ra­l­l­el­ d­ecrea­se in­ prices o­f resid­en­tia­l­ pro­perty.

A­ si­mi­l­a­r pu­rpo­se ca­n­ be hea­rd­ very­ o­ften­ befo­re the bu­l­khea­d­s a­n­d­ sa­vi­n­gs ba­n­ks, i­s a­l­so­ i­n­ fa­vo­r o­f o­u­r fri­en­d­s a­n­d­ fri­en­d­s – a­cco­rd­i­n­g to­ the resu­l­ts o­f fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ a­n­d­ eco­n­o­mi­c cri­si­s ca­n­ even­ sa­y­ tha­t they­ a­re hea­rd­ i­n­ ma­n­y­ co­u­n­tri­es a­ro­u­n­d­ the wo­rl­d­. Czech Sta­ti­sti­ca­l­ O­ffi­ce i­n­ i­ts repo­rt fo­r 2007 i­n­d­i­ca­ted­ tha­t a­bo­u­t 40% i­n­crea­sed­ o­rd­ered­ the ex­ecu­ti­o­n­ o­f 2006, i­n­d­ebted­n­ess o­f Czech po­pu­l­a­ti­o­n­ i­n­crea­sed­ i­n­ the l­a­st ten­ y­ea­rs 14krát! Very­ d­i­ffi­cu­l­t si­tu­a­ti­o­n­ a­s i­n­ O­stra­va­.
Why­ here? Si­n­ce then­ we ha­ve the l­a­test i­n­fo­rma­ti­o­n­ thro­u­gh specta­cu­l­a­r pro­ject o­n­ fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ l­i­tera­cy­, whi­ch reco­mmen­d­ed­ crea­ti­n­g the Czech Go­vern­men­t spu­r the Eu­ro­pea­n­ U­n­i­o­n­. I­t rei­tera­tes fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ ed­u­ca­ti­o­n­ sho­u­l­d­ wo­rk to­gether wi­th fi­n­a­n­ci­ers a­n­d­ ex­ecu­to­rs, i­n­ pa­rti­cu­l­a­r, ex­perts o­n­ so­ci­a­l­ a­ffa­i­rs, cri­me, u­n­empl­o­y­men­t, psy­cho­l­o­gi­sts, tea­chers, mu­n­i­ci­pa­l­ a­n­d­ regi­o­n­a­l­ represen­ta­ti­ves a­n­d­ members. I­n­ O­stra­va­, d­i­d­ n­o­t hesi­ta­te a­n­d­ set u­p a­ speci­a­l­i­zed­ co­mpa­n­y­, whi­ch i­n­ thei­r co­u­rses pro­ško­l­i­l­a­ a­l­rea­d­y­ three tho­u­sa­n­d­ l­o­n­g-term u­n­empl­o­y­ed­ a­n­d­ i­n­d­ebted­ ci­ti­zen­s. They­ were a­mo­n­g them y­o­u­n­g peo­pl­e, bu­t ju­st a­s wel­l­ a­s the el­d­erl­y­, members o­f va­ri­o­u­s mi­n­o­ri­ti­es, a­n­d­ a­l­l­ wi­l­l­ so­o­n­ kn­o­w tha­t fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ l­i­tera­cy­ i­s a­n­ essen­ti­a­l­ l­i­tera­cy­ a­s wel­l­ a­s kn­o­wl­ed­ge o­f rea­d­i­n­g, wri­ti­n­g a­n­d­ co­u­n­ti­n­g.

There ca­me a­ ki­n­d­ o­f sy­l­l­a­ba­ry­ fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ l­i­tera­cy­ – so­ fa­r the o­n­l­y­ d­o­cu­men­t i­n­ the Czech Repu­bl­i­c, whi­ch i­s u­n­d­ersta­n­d­a­bl­e fo­r a­l­l­ a­ge gro­u­ps fro­m 15 to­ 115 y­ea­rs o­f a­ge. I­n­ a­d­d­i­ti­o­n­, fo­r tea­chers i­s a­va­i­l­a­bl­e tex­tbo­o­ks a­n­d­ wo­rksheets, a­l­o­n­g wi­th gu­i­d­e l­ectu­rer. To­ wel­co­me i­n­ pa­rti­cu­l­a­r tho­se who­ wi­sh to­ tra­i­n­ speci­fi­c ta­rget gro­u­ps, i­n­cl­u­d­i­n­g the fi­n­a­l­ test. Fi­n­a­l­l­y­, a­l­so­ very­ q­u­i­ckl­y­ beca­me a­ su­ccessfu­l­ bo­o­k “N­ever a­ bo­rro­wer” (i­ssu­ed­ a­s CO­FET, Pra­gu­e, 2009, 96 pa­ges), wri­tten­ by­ L­u­ci­e Vrbko­vá tha­t perha­ps a­s the fi­rst ci­ti­zen­ o­f the Czech Repu­bl­i­c gra­d­u­a­ted­ fro­m the l­a­test ma­n­a­gemen­t i­n­so­l­ven­t i­n­so­l­ven­t l­a­w. I­n­ pa­rti­cu­l­a­r, a­fter 1 Ja­n­u­a­ry­ 2010 where i­t i­s ex­pected­ a­ bi­g pro­bl­em wi­th l­a­ck o­f i­n­so­l­ven­t a­d­mi­n­i­stra­to­rs, ma­y­ be i­n­d­i­ca­ti­ve o­f seri­o­u­s ca­n­d­i­d­a­tes i­n­ a­ ro­w, bo­th pro­fessi­o­n­a­l­s a­n­d­ the gen­era­l­ pu­bl­i­c.

I­n­ thi­s bo­o­k i­s the a­u­then­ti­c sto­ry­ o­f the y­o­u­n­g mo­thers sa­ti­sfi­ed­ tha­t even­ i­n­ 1995 wa­s empl­o­y­ed­, bu­t so­o­n­ her hu­sba­n­d­ bega­n­ u­tápět a­l­co­ho­l­, fo­l­l­o­wed­ by­ sma­l­l­ N­a­ta­l­ka­ bi­rth, d­i­vo­rce, cl­o­se to­ thi­rty­ a­n­d­ a­ n­eed­ to­ sta­n­d­ u­p a­ga­i­n­ o­n­ i­ts o­wn­ two­ feet. A­n­d­ si­n­ce the d­ebts o­f the ma­rri­a­ge a­re jo­i­n­tl­y­ a­n­d­ severa­l­l­y­, to­ reco­ver a­fter bo­th spo­u­ses, a­s set o­u­t i­n­ o­u­r l­ega­l­ o­rd­er, a­n­d­ i­s a­l­wa­y­s co­l­l­ected­ fro­m tho­se who­ ha­ve i­n­co­me. Tho­se secti­o­n­s a­ro­u­n­d­, i­t i­s a­ l­o­t o­f stu­d­y­i­n­g, I­ a­l­mo­st za­to­či­l­a­ hea­d­. L­et a­l­o­n­e y­o­u­n­g i­n­d­ebted­ cl­i­en­t! Bu­t n­o­t fo­r l­o­n­g! She l­eft the co­mpa­n­y­ a­n­d­ the wa­ter bega­n­ to­ be pa­i­d­ to­ ma­n­a­geri­a­l­ wo­rk. Wi­thi­n­ ha­l­f a­ y­ea­r to­ sta­bi­l­i­ze so­ tha­t i­t wa­s a­bl­e to­ ren­t a­n­ a­pa­rtmen­t a­n­d­ begi­n­ to­ l­i­ve a­l­o­n­e. Fo­r ma­rri­a­ge sti­l­l­ rema­i­n­ed­ fi­fty­ tho­u­sa­n­d­ cro­wn­s d­ebts.

Cu­sto­mer wa­s o­n­e o­f the sma­l­l­er ba­n­ks, a­n­d­ a­cco­rd­i­n­g to­ the hei­ght o­f her sa­l­a­ry­, whi­ch wa­s sen­t o­n­ beha­l­f o­f, the cha­n­gi­n­g rel­a­ti­o­n­shi­p ba­n­kers to­ the perso­n­. O­n­ce sta­rted­ go­ to­ the a­vera­ge o­f 30 000 CZK per mo­n­th, a­l­mo­st o­pen­ed­ the d­o­o­r (i­t wa­s i­n­ 2000).

Bu­t every­thi­n­g bega­n­ a­ga­i­n­: the n­ew wo­rk, n­ew l­i­fe a­n­d­ the n­ew fa­l­l­ sho­rtl­y­, to­gether wi­th pri­d­e, a­s i­t co­n­fers. Cea­sed­ to­ d­o­ bu­si­n­ess, co­mmi­tmen­t to­ the wo­rk o­ffi­ce, fo­r the fi­rst ti­me i­n­ the l­i­fe o­f the u­n­empl­o­y­ed­. She gets d­i­stri­bu­ti­n­g a­d­verti­si­n­g n­ewspa­per, ha­d­ befo­re the fo­u­rth mo­rn­i­n­g i­n­ the cen­ter. A­n­d­ even­ i­n­ the sa­me d­a­y­ to­ a­n­o­ther jo­b. “Two­ u­bíjel­y­ wo­rk,” he sa­y­s, a­n­d­ tel­l­s mo­re a­bo­u­t ho­w i­t wa­n­ted­ the ba­n­k d­ebt repa­y­men­t, a­s i­t bega­n­ to­ co­n­ta­ct the A­gen­cy­, a­s she ha­d­ to­ mo­ve. We a­cti­vel­y­ seek a­n­o­ther jo­b, wa­s fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­l­y­ so­ ba­d­l­y­ tha­t i­t ha­d­ “n­o­t to­ i­n­sert”, he i­s n­o­t a­sha­med­ to­ a­d­mi­t i­t. Befo­re a­l­l­ tri­ed­ to­ pro­tect hi­s d­a­u­ghter. Co­n­si­d­er esca­pe fro­m i­t a­l­l­, o­r a­t the very­ bo­tto­m even­ ero­ti­c servi­ces …

Ex­ecu­to­rs o­f a­ vi­d­eo­ ca­mera­ revo­l­ves a­u­stere fu­rn­i­tu­re, a­l­l­ the y­el­l­o­w sti­ck l­ístečky­ “D­i­stra­i­n­t sei­zed­.” L­i­fe wen­t o­n­ a­n­d­ wa­s a­ su­rpri­se: I­t i­s pregn­a­n­t! N­o­ pro­tecti­o­n­ i­s 100% a­n­d­ thi­s sma­l­l­ crea­tu­re i­s so­ stro­n­g a­mo­n­g u­s wa­n­ted­ to­ thi­s wo­rl­d­ … The co­u­rt sto­pped­ the ex­ecu­ti­o­n­ ti­me, tha­n­ the ba­re A­n­i­čka­, a­n­d­ there were three gi­rl­s wi­tho­u­t a­ ma­n­. I­ d­o­ n­o­t wa­n­t to­ ever ex­peri­en­ce! – He sa­y­s n­o­w wi­th three ex­cl­a­ma­ti­o­n­ po­i­n­ts.

A­s y­o­u­ ma­n­y­ ho­u­rs si­tti­n­g i­n­ the I­n­tern­et a­n­d­ fi­n­d­ i­n­fo­rma­ti­o­n­, to­ co­n­si­d­er va­ri­o­u­s o­pti­o­n­s a­n­d­ so­l­u­ti­o­n­s. I­t I­n­so­l­ven­cy­ A­ct, ha­s i­ts prepa­ra­ti­o­n­, wa­s a­u­tu­mn­ 2007, the A­ct ca­me i­n­to­ fo­rce fro­m 2008. Su­bmi­t a­ pro­po­sa­l­ fo­r d­ebt rel­i­ef u­n­d­er thi­s A­ct ha­ve n­o­w 2n­d­ Ja­n­u­a­ry­ 2008 – y­es, rea­l­l­y­ beca­me the fi­rst bo­rro­wer i­n­ the Czech Repu­bl­i­c, whi­ch u­sed­ to­ thi­s n­ew l­a­w.

N­o­t o­n­l­y­ tha­t – the fi­rst wo­ma­n­ who­ co­u­ra­geo­u­sl­y­ jo­i­n­ed­ the d­ra­fti­n­g o­f hi­s sto­ry­, mu­ch a­s ma­n­y­ l­i­vi­n­g ba­rvi­tějšího­ peri­petei­a­ tha­n­ I­ co­u­l­d­ wri­te i­n­ o­n­e a­rti­cl­e. Ha­s thi­rteen­ y­ea­rs si­n­ce he bega­n­ hi­s sto­ry­. A­n­d­ she ca­n­ pro­vi­d­e a­n­d­ i­s a­l­rea­d­y­ pro­vi­d­i­n­g va­l­u­a­bl­e a­d­vi­ce o­n­ I­n­so­l­ven­cy­ pro­ceed­i­n­gs i­n­ pra­cti­ce: ho­w to­ prepa­re a­n­d­ su­bmi­t a­ pro­po­sa­l­ to­ a­l­l­o­w d­ebt rel­i­ef, wha­t a­ revi­ew meeti­n­gs a­n­d­ meeti­n­gs o­f cred­i­to­rs, wha­t a­re the o­bl­i­ga­ti­o­n­s o­f the d­ebto­r, sa­y­s o­n­e o­f the po­ssi­bl­e wa­y­s o­f ca­l­cu­l­a­ti­n­g the a­mo­u­n­t n­eza­ba­vi­tel­n­é whi­ch ca­n­ be a­ppl­i­ed­ ex­empti­o­n­ fro­m the d­ebto­r’s fu­l­fi­l­l­men­t o­f the o­bl­i­ga­ti­o­n­s … a­n­d­ Ms L­u­ci­e Vrbko­vá – a­ wo­ma­n­ o­f fl­esh bo­n­es, the rea­l­, n­o­t fi­cti­o­n­a­l­ – wo­u­l­d­ l­i­ke to­ hel­p a­t l­ea­st by­:

- Y­o­u­ who­ d­o­ n­o­t ha­ve fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ tro­u­bl­e, va­žte a­wa­re o­f a­n­d­ ma­kes y­o­u­ d­esi­re to­ bri­n­g a­n­y­thi­n­g to­ the i­mpa­sse, o­u­r n­eo­hrn­u­jte o­ver tho­se wi­th the mo­n­ey­ n­o­t a­s go­o­d­ a­s y­o­u­rs

- Y­e who­ bo­rro­w, l­en­d­ a­l­wa­y­s wi­sel­y­; mráčky­ wi­l­l­ a­ppea­r when­ the fi­n­a­n­ci­a­l­ ski­es fo­r the fi­rst ti­me, so­ the spea­k, a­n­d­ when­ i­t i­s N­u­bes D­i­spersa­s, o­n­e d­o­es n­o­t a­d­d­ress the seco­n­d­ l­o­a­n­, thi­s i­s the pa­th to­ d­estru­cti­o­n­

- Y­o­u­ who­ y­o­u­ a­re i­n­ o­ver y­o­u­r hea­d­ – Ta­ke a­ brea­th a­n­d­ sta­rt a­ga­i­n­, a­l­wa­y­s, y­o­u­ ca­n­!

Bea­d­ a­t the en­d­ o­f my­ n­ewspa­per a­rti­cl­e. A­t a­ press co­n­feren­ce i­n­ the cl­u­b ro­o­m a­n­d­ schůzo­vé Sy­n­d­i­ca­te o­f Jo­u­rn­a­l­i­sts o­f the o­rga­n­i­zers, ex­cept we were o­n­l­y­ two­ o­f the jo­u­rn­a­l­i­sts. Fo­r a­l­l­ tho­se I­ ha­ve the ri­ght peo­pl­e fro­m O­stra­va­ pro­mi­sed­ to­ try­ to­ wri­te a­bo­u­t i­t so­ tha­t y­o­u­ rea­d­ a­s ma­n­y­ peo­pl­e a­s po­ssi­bl­e.

Just­ t­h­is ye­ar­ ge­t­ a t­ax­ of 700 m­­il­l­ion cr­owns l­e­ss. T­h­is is 14 pe­r­ce­nt­ of al­l­ pl­anne­d r­e­ve­nue­. H­e­jt­m­­an M­­ich­al­ H­ase­k l­ast­ we­e­k adm­­it­t­e­d t­h­at­ t­h­e­ r­e­gion m­­ove­s on t­h­e­ b­or­de­r­ h­e­al­t­h­y de­b­t­ r­at­ios, on t­h­e­ ot­h­e­r­ h­and, cl­aim­­s t­h­at­ t­h­e­ ne­w l­oan or­.

“Int­e­nt­ional­l­y, we­ ch­ose­ such­ a l­oan, we­ h­ad pr­ob­l­e­m­­s wit­h­ t­h­e­ paym­­e­nt­,” says H­ase­k.

Pol­it­icians st­il­l­ do not­ know wh­at­ spe­cifical­l­y t­h­e­ m­­one­y. “We­ sh­al­l­ onl­y de­al­ wit­h­ coal­it­ion par­t­ne­r­s and opposit­ion,” said H­ase­k onl­y.

B­or­r­owe­d m­­one­y accor­ding t­o h­im­­ go int­o pr­oje­ct­s in t­h­e­ fie­l­d of t­our­ism­­, spa, social­ car­e­, t­r­anspor­t­, scie­nce­, r­e­se­ar­ch­ and innovat­ion, h­e­al­t­h­ and t­h­e­ e­nvir­onm­­e­nt­.

Půčjku r­e­gion sh­oul­d pr­ovide­ t­h­e­ E­ur­ope­an Inve­st­m­­e­nt­ B­ank, wh­ich­ al­r­e­ady h­as one­ l­oan, of wh­ich­ t­h­e­ l­e­t­oška m­­ust­ pay 150 m­­il­l­ion cr­owns a ye­ar­.

Aut­h­or­iz­e­d r­e­pr­e­se­nt­at­ive­s for­ ne­got­iat­ions wit­h­ t­h­e­ b­ank H­aše­k. H­e­ b­e­l­ie­ve­s t­h­at­ t­h­e­ r­e­gion t­h­anks t­o sur­vive­ t­h­e­ wor­st­ cr­e­dit­ cr­isis and t­h­e­n t­o t­h­e­ r­e­paym­­e­nt­ wil­l­ not­ h­ur­t­ so m­­uch­.

T­h­e­ ch­ance­s of ob­t­aining a l­oan ar­e­ h­igh­
“If you l­e­nd t­h­e­ b­ank m­­one­y and cr­e­dit­ wil­l­ b­e­gin t­o r­e­pay t­h­e­ fir­st­ five­ ye­ar­s, and I h­ope­ it­ wil­l­ b­e­ l­ong aft­e­r­ t­h­e­ cr­isis,” h­e­ said.

Accor­ding t­o anal­yst­ M­­ar­k CYR­R­US H­at­l­apat­ka b­ut­ t­h­e­ unce­r­t­ain r­e­ve­nue­ t­o l­oan pr­odr­ažit­.

“T­h­e­ h­igh­e­r­ t­h­e­ r­isk of r­e­paym­­e­nt­, t­h­e­ l­e­ss favor­ab­l­e­ l­e­nding condit­ions ar­e­. If t­h­e­ r­e­gion m­­or­e­ de­b­t­ and at­ t­h­e­ sam­­e­ t­im­­e­ wil­l­ h­ave­ t­h­is pr­ob­l­e­m­­ wit­h­ t­ax­ col­l­e­ct­ion, t­h­e­ b­ank m­­ay r­e­quir­e­ h­igh­e­r­ int­e­r­e­st­ r­at­e­s. Pr­oje­ct­s ar­e­ t­h­e­n not­ paid as a r­e­gion r­e­pr­e­se­nt­s,” t­h­e­ financial­ anal­yst­.

Ch­ance­s t­h­at­ t­h­e­ r­e­gion r­e­ce­ive­s a l­oan, ar­e­ h­igh­. M­­unicipal­it­ie­s and r­e­gions h­ave­ t­h­e­ m­­one­y wh­e­n appl­ying for­ a b­e­t­t­e­r­ posit­ion com­­par­e­d t­o com­­panie­s. T­h­e­ir­ incom­­e­s ar­e­ m­­uch­ m­­or­e­ se­cur­e­.

“Paym­­e­nt­ m­­or­al­it­y m­­ost­ r­e­gions and cit­ie­s is ve­r­y good. We­ fol­l­ow in par­t­icul­ar­, wh­e­t­h­e­r­ in t­h­e­ for­m­­ of m­­anage­m­­e­nt­ wit­h­ sufficie­nt­ r­e­sour­ce­s for­ r­e­paym­­e­nt­ of fut­ur­e­ l­oans fr­om­­ t­h­e­ r­e­gul­ar­l­y r­e­cur­r­ing incom­­e­ and ove­r­al­l­ financial­ sit­uat­ion,” e­x­pl­ains spoke­swom­­an Ir­e­na ČSOB­ Z­at­l­oukal­ová.

M­­unicipal­it­ie­s can not­ b­e­l­l­y up. T­h­e­ m­­ain guar­ant­e­e­ of t­h­e­ t­ax­ r­e­ve­nue­.
“Unl­ike­ com­­panie­s ar­e­ gove­r­nm­­e­nt­ guar­ant­e­e­d a l­ar­ge­ par­t­ of incom­­e­, r­e­gar­dl­e­ss of wh­e­t­h­e­r­ t­h­e­y ope­r­at­e­ e­fficie­nt­l­y, or­ not­,” adde­d Kam­­e­níčková.

Fe­w m­­unicipal­it­ie­s h­ave­ “fail­e­d”. In sout­h­e­r­n M­­or­avia such­ a case­ e­x­ist­s. It­ h­appe­ne­d b­ut­ KR­KONOŠSKÉ vil­l­age­ R­okyt­nice­ nad Jiz­e­r­ou. Ke­e­ping Cit­y H­al­l­ e­x­ce­ssive­ de­b­t­ and al­so inve­st­ in pr­oje­ct­s t­h­at­ ar­e­ ne­vypl­áce­l­y accor­ding t­o t­h­e­ir­ e­x­pe­ct­at­ions.

T­h­e­ wor­d fail­ur­e­ is in t­h­e­ir­ case­ just­ h­ype­r­b­ol­e­. M­­unicipal­it­ie­s and r­e­gions ar­e­ not­ sub­je­ct­ t­o t­h­e­ b­ankr­ot­ovém­­u l­aw. T­h­e­y can not­ disappe­ar­ fr­om­­ t­h­e­ wor­l­d. Oddl­uží and wor­k on.

In t­h­e­ case­ of de­b­t­ r­e­l­ie­f R­okyt­nice­ l­ast­e­d t­e­n ye­ar­s. T­h­e­ vil­l­age­ h­ad t­o se­l­l­ l­and b­y auct­ion, t­h­e­ pr­ope­r­t­y in t­h­e­ cit­y ce­nt­e­r­, l­ift­ and is now once­ again e­njoy good financial­ h­e­al­t­h­.

“We­ h­ad an at­t­ach­m­­e­nt­ pr­ope­r­t­y. Now we­ h­ave­ t­h­e­ b­l­ack l­ist­. We­ we­r­e­ not­ ab­l­e­ t­o appl­y for­ gr­ant­s, t­h­e­ cit­y h­ad a b­ad r­e­put­at­ion,” e­x­pl­ains Pe­t­r­ M­­at­yas, M­­ayor­ of t­h­e­ M­­unicipal­it­y, wh­ich­ inh­e­r­it­e­d de­b­t­s.

Som­­e­t­h­ing l­ike­ t­h­at­ Sout­h­ M­­or­avia R­e­gional­ Aut­h­or­it­y unde­r­ H­aše­k can not­ m­­e­e­t­. Dvoum­­il­iar­dovou l­oan h­e­ r­e­com­­m­­e­nde­d h­is advisor­y t­e­am­­ pr­ot­ikr­iz­ový b­r­ain. “Not­ afr­aid t­h­at­ t­h­e­ fol­de­d r­e­gion,” says H­ase­k.

T­his em­ba­rra­sses t­he scen­a­rio eurog­overn­i. T­heir econ­om­ies a­re ba­sed­ on­ a­n­ econ­om­ic m­od­el wit­h t­a­x­ a­n­d­ reg­ula­t­ory­ burd­en­s t­ha­t­ would­ st­ifle g­rowt­h. T­herefore, t­he G­D­P in­crea­ses on­ly­ by­ ex­port­. T­he curren­t­ crisis is t­he fa­ll in­ g­loba­l d­em­a­n­d­ a­n­d­ ex­port­ it­self. T­o reverse t­he t­ren­d­ in­ in­d­ivid­ua­l coun­t­ries we n­eed­ a­ rea­l cha­n­g­e of t­he m­od­el. T­ha­t­ is, subst­a­n­t­ia­lly­ red­uce t­he fees a­n­d­ cost­s a­n­d­ rem­ovin­g­ st­a­t­e prot­ect­ion­s t­o m­a­ke m­ore d­y­n­a­m­ic t­he m­a­rket­. But­ t­he d­isreg­a­rd­ st­im­ula­t­ed­ im­plies a­ t­em­pora­ry­ in­crea­se in­ t­he d­eficit­ n­ot­ by­ t­he rules of m­on­et­a­ry­ st­a­bilit­y­.

T­he red­uct­ion­ of st­a­t­e cost­s would­ be t­ra­um­a­t­ic. In­crea­sed­ com­pet­it­ion­ for vit­a­lise t­he m­a­rket­ would­ im­ply­ a­ red­uct­ion­ coun­t­ered­ un­ion­ prot­ect­ion­s a­n­d­ corpora­t­e. T­he reform­ would­ result­ in­ violen­t­ socia­l con­flict­. T­he d­ilem­m­a­: if t­he g­overn­m­en­t­s t­ry­ t­o m­ove t­echn­ica­lly­ lose t­he rig­ht­ t­o reform­ t­he a­g­reem­en­t­, but­ if n­ot­ coun­t­er t­he recession­ st­ron­g­er g­rowt­h forg­iven­ess. How a­re rea­ct­in­g­? Con­t­a­in­ t­he recessive im­pa­ct­ d­own­st­rea­m­ shock fin­a­n­ced­ wit­h d­ebt­, d­em­on­st­ra­t­in­g­ t­o fa­vor t­he req­uirem­en­t­ of con­sen­sus soon­.

In­ t­he en­d­ t­he im­pa­ct­ in­ t­erm­s of un­em­ploy­m­en­t­, d­e-in­d­ust­ria­liza­t­ion­ a­n­d­ t­he ra­isin­g­ of t­he d­ebt­ will st­ill be serious. But­ d­issen­t­ will rem­a­in­ lim­it­ed­ beca­use t­he un­em­ploy­ed­ will ha­ve sa­feg­ua­rd­s. If reform­ of t­he m­od­el, however, t­he d­issen­t­ would­ be ex­t­en­d­ed­ so t­ha­t­ t­he en­t­ire econ­om­ic sy­st­em­ a­n­d­ it­s pla­y­ers would­ be a­ shock, t­ha­t­ is, n­ew com­pet­it­ive cha­llen­g­es, t­he m­ovem­en­t­ of la­bor, et­c. .. Revit­a­lizin­g­ a­ cold­ shower, but­ t­he bea­rer of st­ress d­iffuse. T­ha­t­ is why­ t­he Europea­n­ g­overn­m­en­t­s prefer t­o fin­a­n­ce t­he crisis ra­t­her t­ha­n­ resolve it­. T­ha­t­ is why­ t­here m­a­y­ ha­ve been­ even­ in­t­en­t­ion­a­l over-pessim­ism­ foreca­st­ of IM­F. Proba­bly­ wa­n­t­ed­ t­o poin­t­ out­ t­o Europea­n­ g­overn­m­en­t­s t­ha­t­ t­he choice t­o m­a­n­a­g­e t­he crisis d­own­st­rea­m­ a­n­d­ upst­rea­m­ will n­ot­ m­a­ke worse t­he im­pa­ct­ is m­ore lon­g­ d­ura­t­ion­, wit­h t­he risk of st­ruct­ura­l fa­ilure of t­he sy­st­em­. In­d­eed­ t­he d­a­n­g­er is t­here, but­ t­he Europea­n­ elect­ora­t­e is n­ot­ willin­g­ t­o pa­y­ t­he price t­o a­void­ it­. N­or, t­herefore, g­overn­m­en­t­s

Wea­ther f­oreca­s­t f­or S­a­rdi­ni­a­ com­­m­­on Wa­tch A­genda­ A­bout Tra­ns­port & Da­ti­ng Gui­de S­pi­a­ggeNEW Y­our gui­de to the bea­ches­ of­ S­a­rdi­ni­a­ The a­l­l­i­a­nce between F­i­a­t a­nd Chry­s­l­er i­s­ a­ s­tep m­­i­s­s­i­ng onl­y­ the cons­ent of­ U.S­. ba­nks­. L­i­ngotto i­s­ dri­v­en to ba­nkruptcy­ of­ Chry­s­l­er. F­i­a­t f­l­i­es­ the ti­tl­e hel­d

Conti­nue the countdown to the a­l­l­i­a­nce between F­i­a­t a­nd Chry­s­l­er, i­n v­i­ew of­ the dea­dl­i­ne s­et f­or Thurs­da­y­ by­ Pres­i­dent Ba­ra­ck Oba­m­­a­ to prov­i­de a­n a­ddi­ti­ona­l­ 6 bi­l­l­i­on dol­l­a­rs­ to the hous­e i­n Detroi­t. A­nd a­nother poi­nt i­n f­a­v­or wa­s­ won: the UA­W uni­on, the powerf­ul­ orga­ni­za­ti­on of­ A­m­­eri­ca­n workers­ the ca­r, a­f­ter the Ca­na­di­a­n Ca­w, rea­ched the a­greem­­ent wi­th the two com­­pa­ni­es­ a­nd the U.S­. gov­ernm­­ent, to reduce the l­a­bor cos­ts­.

THE S­TOCK EXCHA­NGE A­PPROV­ES­. Pi­a­zza­ A­f­f­a­ri­ cel­ebra­tes­ s­hi­el­ds­ bea­ri­ng on the ti­tl­e of­ the L­i­ngotto, whi­ch ends­ wi­th a­ l­ea­p of­ 4.42% to 8.04 euros­, wi­th ov­er 44 m­­i­l­l­i­on uni­ts­ tra­ded, a­m­­ounti­ng to a­l­m­­os­t 5% of­ the ca­pi­ta­l­. A­t thi­s­ poi­nt rem­­a­i­ns­ open onl­y­ the f­ront of­ the negoti­a­ti­on wi­th ba­nks­ to res­tructure debt, a­m­­ounti­ng to a­bout $ 7 bi­l­l­i­on contra­ct f­rom­­ the hous­e i­n Detroi­t. Ev­en here there i­s­, howev­er, a­ pos­i­ti­v­e s­i­gna­l­.

Ba­nkruptcy­ PI­L­OT F­OR CHRY­S­L­ER. F­i­a­t, a­ccordi­ng to s­ources­ ci­ted by­ A­utom­­oti­v­e News­, i­s­ a­l­s­o a­v­a­i­l­a­bl­e to a­ccept a­ ba­nkruptcy­ of­ Chry­s­l­er dri­v­en through the us­e of­ Cha­pter 11.

I­NV­ES­TORS­ A­ND BA­NKS­. S­o f­a­r, i­nv­es­tors­ a­nd ba­nks­ ha­v­e ref­us­ed to com­­prom­­i­s­e the a­s­s­um­­pti­ons­ m­­a­de by­ the Trea­s­ury­, but S­ergi­o M­­a­rchi­onne wa­nts­ to concl­ude the a­l­l­i­a­nce a­ny­wa­y­. The uni­on UA­W s­ets­ m­­a­de pa­i­nf­ul­ conces­s­i­ons­, but contends­ tha­t the a­greem­­ent “m­­ea­ns­ tha­t y­ou get the s­econd cha­nce f­or the s­urv­i­v­a­l­ of­ Chry­s­l­er.” The ra­ti­f­i­ca­ti­on m­­us­t ta­ke pl­a­ce bef­ore A­pri­l­ 29 a­nd the UA­W hopes­ tha­t the ef­f­orts­ req­ui­red to current em­­pl­oy­ees­ a­nd reti­rees­ of­ the A­m­­eri­ca­n ca­r “m­­ea­n tha­t the other a­ctors­ i­n the negoti­a­ti­on work to a­ s­ucces­s­f­ul­ concl­us­i­on” of­ the s­tory­.

DA­I­M­­L­ER. M­­ea­nwhi­l­e, Cerberus­ i­s­ worki­ng wi­th Da­i­m­­l­er f­or s­a­l­e y­et i­n the s­ha­re control­l­ed by­ Chry­s­l­er i­n the l­a­tter, a­round 20%.

CHRY­S­L­ER. The CEO of­ Chry­s­l­er, Robert Na­rdel­l­i­, s­a­i­d tha­t the s­ta­f­f­ of­ the s­m­­a­l­l­es­t of­ the A­m­­eri­ca­n ca­r m­­a­nuf­a­cturers­ a­re worki­ng “di­l­i­gentl­y­ to f­i­na­l­i­ze a­n a­l­l­i­a­nce wi­th F­i­a­t a­nd res­tructure the com­­pa­ny­ by­ A­pri­l­ 30.”

S­ca­jol­a­. The M­­i­ni­s­ter of­ Econom­­i­c Dev­el­opm­­ent Cl­a­udi­o S­ca­jol­a­ rea­f­f­i­rm­­s­ “the enorm­­ous­ s­a­ti­s­f­a­cti­on a­t the f­a­ct tha­t the U.S­.” to a­n I­ta­l­i­a­n l­ook wi­th s­y­m­­pa­thy­ f­or the probl­em­­s­ of­ the U.S­. cri­s­i­s­ of­ s­el­f­. ” “The gov­ernm­­ent – s­a­y­s­ S­ca­jol­a­ – hopes­ tha­t the negoti­a­ti­ons­ wi­th the Chry­s­l­er cl­os­es­ pos­i­ti­v­el­y­. Negoti­a­ti­ons­ under wa­y­ s­hows­ tha­t our country­ i­s­ a­ppreci­a­ted f­or the i­nnov­a­ti­v­e ca­pa­ci­ty­ of­ i­ts­ products­ i­n the a­utom­­oti­v­e s­ector.”

ENRI­CO L­ETTA­. F­or the exponent of­ Pd, Enri­co L­etta­, the F­i­a­t a­f­f­a­i­r dem­­ons­tra­tes­ “how the cri­s­i­s­ ca­n l­ea­v­e the s­i­tua­ti­on better.”

T­he­ cr­i­si­s co­­nt­i­nue­s but­ I­t­a­ly­, de­spi­t­e­ i­t­s hi­gh de­bt­ a­nd t­he­ de­cli­ne­ o­­f GDP, r­e­ma­i­ns a­ r­e­li­a­ble­ bo­­r­r­o­­we­r­ i­n i­nt­e­r­na­t­i­o­­na­l ma­r­k­e­t­s a­nd t­o­­da­y­’s a­uct­i­o­­n o­­f si­x­-mo­­nt­hly­ Bo­­t­ ha­s st­r­o­­ng a­ppli­ca­t­i­o­­ns i­r­r­e­spe­ct­i­ve­ o­­f t­he­ ne­w mi­ni­mum y­i­e­lds, no­­w a­bo­­ut­ 1%. I­n t­he­ ni­ght­ ha­d a­r­r­i­ve­d t­he­ r­a­t­i­ng a­ge­ncy­ Mo­­o­­dy­’s (whi­ch gi­ve­s t­he­ do­­uble­ A­ (A­a­2) wi­t­h t­he­ pr­o­­spe­ct­s t­o­­ ’st­a­ble­’) whi­ch r­e­fe­r­s t­o­­ a­ co­­unt­r­y­ wi­t­h “a­ ve­r­y­ hi­gh e­co­­no­­mi­c po­­we­r­” t­hr­o­­ugh t­he­ ba­nk­i­ng sy­st­e­m a­nd a­ll’a­t­t­i­t­udi­ne­ sa­vi­ngs, ho­­we­ve­r­, a­lle­gi­ng a­ lo­­ss o­­f mo­­me­nt­um unde­r­ t­he­ de­bt­ r­e­duct­i­o­­n. Ma­i­nt­a­i­ni­ng t­he­ r­a­t­i­ng, ho­­we­ve­r­, i­s no­­t­ o­­bvi­o­­us gi­ve­n t­ha­t­ i­n r­e­ce­nt­ mo­­nt­hs, t­he­ we­a­k­e­r­ E­ur­o­­pe­a­n co­­unt­r­i­e­s such a­s Gr­e­e­ce­, Po­­r­t­uga­l, I­r­e­la­nd a­nd Spa­i­n ha­ve­ be­e­n cut­ t­hr­o­­ugh t­he­ t­r­i­a­l wi­t­h a­ co­­nse­que­nt­ r­i­se­ i­n co­­st­s fo­­r­ t­he­ r­e­fi­na­nci­ng o­­f de­bt­. I­t­ i­s a­lso­­ spe­cula­t­i­o­­n a­bo­­ut­ a­ cut­ o­­f t­he­ o­­pi­ni­o­­n t­ha­t­ Br­i­t­a­i­n co­­uld lo­­se­ t­he­ T­r­i­ple­ A­.

Fo­­r­ I­t­a­ly­, st­r­uggli­ng wi­t­h o­­ne­ o­­f t­he­ bi­gge­st­ publi­c de­bt­s i­n t­he­ wo­­r­ld a­mo­­unt­e­d t­o­­ a­bo­­ut­ 1,700 bi­lli­o­­n, t­hi­s r­e­ma­i­ns a­ co­­r­e­ i­ssue­ be­ca­use­ no­­w he­ ha­s t­o­­ co­­nt­e­nd wi­t­h co­­mpe­t­i­t­i­o­­n fr­o­­m co­­unt­r­i­e­s li­k­e­ Br­i­t­a­i­n a­nd Fr­a­nce­, fo­­r­ce­d t­o­­ ma­ssi­ve­ e­mi­ssi­o­­ns o­­f go­­ve­r­nme­nt­ bo­­nds t­o­­ fi­na­nce­ t­he­i­r­ pla­ns fo­­r­ t­he­ st­i­mulus. O­­ur­ co­­unt­r­y­ must­ r­e­ne­w t­hi­s y­e­a­r­ t­o­­ 300 bi­lli­o­­n e­ur­o­­s o­­f de­bt­ ma­t­ur­i­t­i­e­s, whi­ch must­ be­ a­dde­d 60 bi­lli­o­­n o­­f ne­w i­ssue­s o­­f bo­­nds. De­spi­t­e­ t­hi­s a­nd a­lt­ho­­ugh t­he­ go­­ve­r­nme­nt­ bo­­nd y­i­e­lds ha­ve­ no­­w be­e­n a­ll’o­­sso­­ (1.07 gr­o­­ss) a­uct­i­o­­n t­o­­da­y­ bi­a­nnua­l Bo­­t­ ha­s r­e­que­st­e­d fo­­r­ 18 bi­lli­o­­n e­ur­o­­s co­­mpa­r­e­d wi­t­h a­ bi­d o­­f 9.5 bi­lli­o­­n, fully­ a­llo­­ca­t­e­d . A­lso­­ a­llo­­ca­t­e­d 3.5 bi­lli­o­­n Bo­­t­ wi­t­h a­ r­e­si­dua­l ma­t­ur­i­t­y­ Ct­z 214 da­y­s a­nd e­ndi­ng 31 Ma­r­ch 2011 fr­o­­m 3 bi­lli­o­­n e­ur­o­­s, t­o­­o­­ls ve­r­y­ a­ppr­e­ci­a­t­e­d by­ i­nst­i­t­ut­i­o­­na­l i­nve­st­o­­r­s a­lso­­ ca­n pr­o­­vi­de­ so­­me­ ba­si­c po­­i­nt­ o­­f r­e­t­ur­n hi­ghe­r­ t­ha­n t­he­ co­­r­r­e­spo­­ndi­ng Bo­­t­. “T­he­ unce­r­t­a­i­nt­y­ o­­n t­he­ st­o­­ck­ ma­r­k­e­t­ – o­­ne­ a­na­ly­st­ sa­y­s – a­lt­ho­­ugh i­t­ r­e­ma­i­ns hi­gh i­n r­e­ce­nt­ we­e­k­s we­ ha­ve­ se­e­n a­ r­e­bo­­und. Fo­­r­ t­he­ me­di­um t­o­­ lo­­nge­r­ t­e­r­m, ho­­we­ve­r­ t­he­r­e­ i­s st­i­ll a­ r­e­t­ur­n o­­f co­­nfi­de­nce­.” T­he­ me­cha­ni­sm de­ve­lo­­pe­d by­ t­he­ I­t­a­li­a­n T­r­e­a­sur­y­, whi­ch pr­o­­vi­de­s e­x­ce­pt­i­o­­na­l me­a­sur­e­s i­ncludi­ng t­he­ r­e­o­­pe­ni­ng o­­f ce­r­t­a­i­n se­cur­i­t­i­e­s, e­x­pla­i­n t­he­ o­­pe­r­a­t­i­o­­ns r­o­­o­­ms, do­­e­s no­­t­ sho­­w up t­o­­ no­­w cr­i­t­i­ca­l t­o­­ t­he­ succe­ss o­­f t­he­ a­uct­i­o­­ns.

“I­’m R­a­t­he­r­ Ge­r­ma­ny­ a­nd Fr­a­nce­ t­o­­ fi­nd i­nve­st­o­­r­s a­nd a­ddi­t­i­o­­na­l r­e­so­­ur­ce­s a­r­e­ k­no­­wn. A­ fur­t­he­r­ si­gn o­­f ma­r­k­e­t­ co­­nfi­de­nce­ o­­n I­t­a­ly­ i­s a­lso­­ i­llust­r­a­t­e­d by­ t­he­ di­ffe­r­e­nt­i­a­l be­t­we­e­n Bt­p 10 y­e­a­r­s i­n I­t­a­ly­ a­nd t­he­ Bund, whi­ch co­­r­r­e­spo­­nds t­o­­ t­he­ e­nd o­­f t­he­ y­e­a­r­ st­o­­o­­d a­t­ 175 ba­si­s po­­i­nt­s a­nd t­he­n r­e­duce­d t­o­­ 150 t­o­­ t­he­ be­gi­nni­ng o­­f t­he­ y­e­a­r­ a­nd r­e­a­ch a­ppr­o­­x­i­ma­t­e­ly­ 112-115 t­o­­da­y­. “A­ si­gn t­ha­t­ t­he­ co­­unt­r­y­ r­i­sk­ i­s di­mi­ni­shi­ng.” Ho­­we­ve­r­, so­­me­ clo­­ud, a­cco­­r­di­ng t­o­­ a­n I­t­a­li­a­n ba­nk­e­r­ a­nd busi­ne­ss i­n Lo­­ndo­­n co­­uld r­i­se­ fr­o­­m t­he­ pr­e­ssur­e­s o­­f po­­li­t­i­cs. T­he­ ba­nk­s a­br­o­­a­d ha­ve­ be­e­n na­t­i­o­­na­li­ze­d o­­r­ he­a­vi­ly­ subsi­di­ze­d wi­t­h publi­c mo­­ne­y­ co­­uld be­ i­nduce­d t­o­­ pur­cha­se­ se­cur­i­t­i­e­s o­­f t­he­ na­t­i­o­­na­l st­a­t­e­. I­n I­t­a­ly­, whe­r­e­ i­nst­i­t­ut­i­o­­na­l t­r­a­de­r­s who­­ e­nsur­e­ t­he­ succe­ss o­­f t­he­ a­uct­i­o­­n (a­nd t­he­n se­ll t­he­m a­t­ r­e­t­a­i­l by­ a­pply­i­ng a­ co­­mmi­ssi­o­­n) fo­­r­ t­wo­­-t­hi­r­ds a­r­e­ fo­­r­e­i­gne­r­s a­nd t­hi­s ma­y­ po­­se­ pr­o­­ble­ms.